osho samadhi समाधिः

messages from all enlightened masters

ch9 : The Dhammapada: The Way of the Buddha, Vol 3

f:id:premmashal:20181227111149j:image
 
'And in no-mind you will know the ultimate truth, DHAMMA.
And moving from mind to no-mind is the step, PADA. 
And this is the whole secret of THE DHAMMAPADA.'
 
 
 
ch9 : The Dhammapada: The Way of the Buddha, Vol 3
 
chapter 9
A small candle
 
20 August 1979 am in Buddha Hall
 
 
 
BETTER THAN A THOUSAND HOLLOW WORDS
IS ONE WORD THAT BRINGS PEACE.
 
BETTER THAN A THOUSAND HOLLOW VERSES
IS ONE VERSE THAT BRINGS PEACE.
 
BETTER THAN A HUNDRED HOLLOW LINES
IS THE ONE LINE OF THE LAW, BRINGING PEACE.
 
IT IS BETTER TO CONQUER YOURSELF
THAN TO WIN A THOUSAND BATTLES.
THEN THE VICTORY IS YOURS.
 
IT CANNOT BE TAKEN FROM YOU,
NOT BY ANGELS OR BY DEMONS,
HEAVEN OR HELL.
 
BETTER THAN A HUNDRED YEARS OF WORSHIP,
BETTER THAN A THOUSAND OFFERINGS,
BETTER THAN GIVING UP A THOUSAND WORLDLY WAYS
IN ORDER TO WIN MERIT,
 
BETTER EVEN THAN TENDING IN THE FOREST
A SACRED FLAME FOR A HUNDRED YEARS
IS ONE MOMENT'S REVERENCE
FOR THE MAN WHO HAS CONQUERED HIMSELF.
 
TO REVERE SUCH A MAN,
A MASTER OLD IN VIRTUE AND HOLINESS,
IS TO HAVE VICTORY OVER LIFE ITSELF,
AND BEAUTY, STRENGTH AND HAPPINESS.
 
 
 
A famous story:
 
One night the great German philosopher, Professor Von Kochenbach, 
saw two doors in a dream, 
 
one of which led directly to love and paradise, 
 
and the other to an auditorium where a lecture was being given on love and paradise. 
 
There was no hesitation on Von Kochenbach's part 
-- he darted in to hear the lecture.
 
 
 
The story is significant. 
 
It is fictitious, but not so fictitious really. 
 
It represents the human mind: 
 
it is more interested in knowledge than in wisdom, 
 
it is more interested in information than TRANSformation. 
 
It is more interested to know about God, beauty, truth, love, 
than experience God, beauty, truth, love.
 
 
 
The human mind is obsessed with words, theories, systems of thought, 
but is completely oblivious of the existential that surrounds you. 
 
And it is the existential which can liberate, not knowledge about it.
 
The story represents everybody's mind. 
 
But I was in for a surprise yesterday. 
 
 
 
I was reading a book by Silvano Arieti, M.D., and James Silvano Arieti, Ph.D. 
 
In their book, LOVE CAN BE FOUND, they quote this story. 
 
I was hoping, obviously, that they would laugh at the story and criticize the whole standpoint
 
But I was in for a surprise: 
they defended the story; 
 
they say the professor did the right thing. 
 
Rather than entering directly into the door of love and paradise, 
entering into the auditorium where a lecture was being delivered on love and paradise 
-- of course by some other professor -- 
they say the professor did the right thing. 
 
Why? 
 
Their reasoning is that unless you know about love, 
how can you know love? 
 
Unless you know about paradise first, 
how can you immediately enter into paradise?
 
 
 
On the surface it looks logical: 
 
first one has to become acquainted with what paradise is, 
only then can one enter paradise. 
 
First you have to have a map. 
 
Logical, still stupid; 
logical only in appearance, 
but deep down utterly unintelligent.
 
 
 
Love needs no information about it, 
because it is not something outside you, 
it is the very core of your being. 
 
You have already got it, 
you have only to allow it to flow. 
 
Paradise is not somewhere else 
so that you need a map to reach there. 
 
 
 
You ARE in paradise, 
only you have fallen asleep. 
 
 
 
All that is needed is an awakening.
 
 
 
An awakening can be immediate, 
awakening can be sudden 
 
-- in fact, awakening can ONLY be sudden. 
 
 
 
When you wake somebody up, 
it is not that slowly slowly, in parts, gradually, he wakes up. 
 
It is not that now he is ten percent awake, now twenty, now thirty, now forty, now ninety-nine, now ninety-nine point nine, and then a hundred percent -- no. 
 
When you shake a sleepy person, 
he awakes immediately. 
 
Either one is asleep or one is awake; 
there is no place in between. 
 
 
 
Hence Buddha says enlightenment is a sudden experience; 
 
it is not gradual, 
it is not that you arrive in steps. 
 
Enlightenment cannot be divided into parts; 
it is an indivisible, organic unity. 
 
Either you have it 
or 
you don't have it.
 
 
 
But man has remained clinging to words
-- words which are hollow
words which carry no meaning, 
words which have no significance, 
words which have been uttered by as ignorant people as you are. 
 
Maybe they were educated, 
but education does not dispel ignorance. 
 
 
 
Knowing about light is not going to dispel darkness. 
 
 
 
You can know all that is available in the world about light; 
you can have a library in your room consisting only of books on light, 
yet that whole library will not be able to dispel the darkness
 
 
 
To dispel the darkness you will need a small candle 
-- that will do the miracle.
 
 
 
Looking into the ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA 
I was happy to note that it has no articles on love. 
 
That's a great insight! 
 
In fact, nothing can be written about love. 
 
One can love, 
one can be in love, 
one can even become love, 
 
but nothing can be written about love. 
 
The experience is so subtle 
and the words are so gross.
 
It is because of the words that humanity has been divided. 
 
 
 
A few people believe in a few hollow words 
-- they call themselves Hindus; 
 
others believe in a few other hollow words 
-- they call themselves Jews; 
 
still others call themselves Christians and Mohammedans, and so on, so forth. 
 
And they all believe in hollow words. 
 
It is not that you have experienced anything. 
 
Your being a Hindu or a Jew or a Mohammedan 
is not based on your own experience 
-- it is borrowed. 
 
And anything borrowed is futile.
 
 
 
But man has suffered much because of the words. 
 
A few people believe in the TALMUD, 
a few people believe in the TAO TEH CHING, 
a few people believe in THE DHAMMAPADA... 
 
and they have been fighting, quarreling, criticizing 
-- not only that, but killing each other. 
 
The whole history is full of blood -- 
in the name of God, 
in the name of love, 
in the name of brotherhood, 
in the name of humanity.
 
 
 
Mistress Rosenbaum became stranded one evening in a very "exclusive" resort section of Cape Cod
 
"Exclusive" meant that Jews were excluded. 
 
She entered the town hotel and said to the desk clerk, 
 
"I would like a room"
 
"Sorry," 
 
he replied. 
 
"The hotel is full."
 
"Then why does the sign say 'Rooms Available'?"
 
"We don't admit Jews."
 
"But Jesus himself was a Jew."
 
"How do you know that Jesus Christ was Jewish?"
 
"He went in his father's business. 
And, moreover, it so happened that I converted to Catholicism. 
Ask me any question and I will prove it."
 
"Alright," 
 
said the desk clerk. 
 
"How was Jesus born?"
 
"By virgin birth. 
The mama's name was Mary and the papa's name was the Holy Spirit."
 
"Okay, where was Jesus born?"
 
"In a stable."
 
"That's right. And why was he born in a stable?"
 
"Because," 
 
Mrs. Rosenbaum snapped,
 
"bastards like you would not rent a room for the night to a Jewish woman!"
 
 
 
But these bastards are everywhere. 
 
They have become the priests and the rabbis and the pundits and the shankaracharyas and the popes. 
 
These people are clever, cunning -- with words. 
 
They are logic choppers, 
they can split hairs; 
they can argue endlessly about useless things, 
about such stupid things that later on for centuries you laugh at the whole thing.
 
 
 
In the Middle Ages, Christian priests 
-- Catholics, Protestants and others -- 
were in a big debate, great discussion was going on for centuries about 
how many angels can stand on a needle point. 
 
It was a great theological debate, 
it had stirred the whole of Europe,
as if something tremendously important was involved in it. 
 
How does it matter? 
 
But such stupid things have been dominating humanity for centuries.
 
 
 
In Buddha's time it was one of the greatest problems in India, 
discussed by all the sects, 
whether there is one hell or three or seven or seven hundred. 
 
Hindus believe in one hell, 
Jainas were talking about seven hells; 
and a disciple of Mahavira, Goshalak, who betrayed the master, started talking about seven hundred hells.
 
Somebody asked Goshalak,
 
"Why do you say that your philosophy is superior, higher than Mahavira's?"
 
He said, 
 
"You can see: 
he knows only about seven hells 
and I know about seven hundred. 
 
He has gone only up to seven 
and I have traveled the whole way. 
 
And just as there are seven hundred hells, 
there are exactly seven hundred heavens. 
 
His knowledge is very limited, 
he does not know the whole truth."
 
Now, you can go on talking about such things. 
 
Some other fool can say that there are seven hundred and one....
 
 
 
A French professor and an American were talking. 
The French professor said, 
 
"There are one hundred positions in which love can be made."
 
The American said,
 
"There are a hundred and one."
 
Now great argument ensued.
 
The American asked,
 
"You relate your hundred positions, 
then I will relate my hundred and one positions."
 
The French professor described in detail one hundred positions. 
 
The hundredth was hanging on a chandelier 
and doing it in the ear of the woman!
 
Now was the turn of the American. He said, 
 
"The first position is: 
the woman lies down on her back with the man on top of her."
 
The French professor said, 
 
"My God! I never thought about it! 
So you are right -- there are a hundred and one. 
You need not now relate the whole thing; 
there ARE a hundred and one. 
This one I never heard, never thought of even, never could have imagined. 
You Americans are something!"
 
These professors, these scholars, they have dominated humanity, 
and they have distracted humanity from simple existence, from simple life. 
 
They have made your minds very sophisticated, clever, cunning, knowledgeable, 
but they have destroyed your innocence and wonder. 
 
And it is innocence and wonder that become the bridge to the immediate 
-- and the immediate is also the ultimate.
 
Buddha says:
 
 
 
BETTER THAN A THOUSAND HOLLOW WORDS IS ONE WORD THAT BRINGS PEACE.
BETTER THAN A THOUSAND HOLLOW WORDS.... 
 
 
 
Your scriptures are full of hollow words, 
your minds are full of hollow words. 
 
You go on talking, 
not even becoming aware of what you are saying. 
 
When you use the word 'God', 
do you know what it means? 
 
How can you know if you have not known God? 
 
The word is empty, 
the word itself cannot have any significance; 
 
the significance has to come from your experience.
 
 
 
When you know God 
and you utter the word 'God', 
it is luminous, 
it is full of light, 
it is a diamond. 
 
But when you know nothing of God, 
but only the word 'God' taught by others, 
it is an ordinary pebble 
with no color, 
with no luminosity, 
with no light in it. 
 
You can go on carrying it; 
it is simply a weight, a burden. 
 
You can drag it. 
 
It will not become your wings, 
it will not make you light, 
and it will not help you in any way to arrive closer to God. 
 
In fact it will hinder you, obstruct you, 
because the more you think you know about God, 
just by knowing the word 'God', 
the less you will inquire into the reality of God. 
 
The more you become knowledgeable, 
the less is the possibility of your ever going on the adventure of searching out the truth of God. 
 
When you already know, 
what is the point of inquiring, 
what is the point of investigating? 
 
You have killed the question. 
 
You have not solved it, 
you have not got the answer; 
you have taken it from others. 
 
But others' answers can't be your answers.
 
 
 
Buddha knows, 
but when he speaks, 
his words cannot carry his experience. 
 
When they leave his heart 
they are full of light, 
they are full of dance. 
 
When they reach to you they are dull, dead. 
 
You can accumulate those words, 
you can think that you have a great treasure, 
but you have nothing at all. 
 
All that you have are empty words.
 
 
 
Buddha wants you to become aware of this phenomenon, 
because this is of great importance. 
 
 
 
Unless you are free of empty, hollow words, 
you will not start the journey of inquiry. 
 
Unless you drop your so-called knowledge, 
unless you discard all your information, 
unless you become again innocent like a child, ignorant like a child, 
your inquiry is going to be futile, superficial.
 
 
 
BETTER THAN A THOUSAND HOLLOW WORDS IS ONE WORD THAT BRINGS PEACE. 
 
 
 
And what is the criterion? 
 
Which word is luminous? 
 
Which word is really full of fragrance? 
 
The word that brings peace. 
 
And that word never comes from the outside 
-- it is the still, small voice of your own heart. 
 
It is heard at the deepest recesses of your being: 
it is the sound of your own being, 
it is the song of your own life.
 
It is not to be found in the scriptures 
and it is not to be found in learned discourses. 
 
It is to be found only if you go in; 
it is to be found only in meditation, in deep silence. 
 
 
 
When all borrowed knowledge has left you 
and you are alone, 
when all the scriptures have been burned 
and you are left alone, 
when you don't know a thing, 
when you function from a state of not-knowing, 
then it is heard,
 
because then all the clamor of knowledge and the noise is gone... 
you can hear the still, small voice. 
 
And then a single word... 
it is a single word: 
 
 
 
it is the sound of OM ओम् .
 
 
 
The moment you enter into your being 
you will be surprised to find that there is a constant sound that appears like 'om ओम् '
 
 
 
Mohammedans have heard it as 'amin
-- it is om ओम् ;
 
Christians have heard it as 'amen'; 
it is the same sound. 
 
Hence the Christian, 
the Mohammedan, 
the Hindu, 
the Jaina, 
the Buddhist, 
they all end their prayers with om ओम् .
 
The prayer is bound to end in om ओम् ,
the prayer makes you more and more silent... 
 
finally there is nothing but om ओम् .
 
All Hindu scriptures end with 
 
OM, SHANTIH, SHANTIH, SHANTIH 
 
-- om, peace, peace, peace. 
 
om, śāntiḥ, śāntiḥ, śāntiḥ.
 
ओम् , शान्तिः , शान्तिः , शान्तिः .
 
This is the word 'om ओम् '.
 
 
 
And the criterion to judge whether you have really heard it 
or 
you have pretended to hear it 
or 
you have imagined hearing it is that 
it brings peace. 
 
Suddenly you are full of peace 
-- a peace that you had never known before.
 
 
 
Peace is something far superior to happiness, 
because happiness is always followed by unhappiness; 
 
it is always a mixture of polar opposites: 
happiness / unhappiness. 
 
They are like day and night, 
they follow each other.
 
If you are a pessimist you can count nights, if you are an optimist you can count the days; 
 
that is the only difference in people. 
 
There are a few people who say, 
 
"There are two days and one night between two days" 
 
-- those are the optimists. 
 
And then there are people who say, 
 
"There are two nights and only one day sandwiched in between"
 
-- they are the pessimists.
 
 
 
But in reality both are wrong. 
 
Each night has its day 
and each day has its night; 
they are equal. 
 
All polar opposites are equal; 
that's how existence remains balanced.
 
 
 
If you have happiness today, 
wait 
-- tomorrow the unhappiness will come. 
 
If you are unhappy today, 
don't be worried
-- happiness will be just by the corner.
 
 
 
In Indian villages mothers don't allow their children to laugh too much, 
because, they say, 
 
"If you laugh too much 
then you will have to cry, 
you will have to weep." 
 
And there is great wisdom in it 
-- a primitive wisdom, unsophisticated, 
but it has some truth in it. 
 
Mothers in Indian villages will stop the child 
if he is giggling too much and laughing too much. 
 
They will say, 
 
"Stop, stop right now! 
Otherwise soon you will be crying and weeping and tears will come."
 
It is bound to be so 
because nature balances.
 
 
 
Peace is something far higher than happiness. 
 
Buddha does not call it bliss just for this reason: 
 
if you call it bliss, which it is... 
 
but he avoids the word 'bliss' 
because the moment you call it bliss 
people understand immediately 'happiness'. 
 
Bliss gives them the idea of 
absolute happiness, 
great happiness, 
tremendous happiness, 
incredible happiness, 
but the difference between happiness and bliss in people's minds is only of quantity, 
as if bliss is the ocean 
and happiness is just a dewdrop. 
 
But the difference is only of quantity
-- and the difference of quantity is not a real difference, 
it is not a difference that makes a difference. 
 
Only qualitative differences are real differences. 
 
Hence Buddha has chosen the word 'peace' 
instead of 'bliss'. 
 
 
 
He says peace 
-- peace gives you a totally different direction to inquire, to search. 
 
Peace means 
no happiness, no unhappiness.
 
 
 
Happiness is also 
a state of noise, 
a state of tension, 
excitement.
 
Have you observed? 
 
-- you cannot remain happy for a long long time, 
because it starts getting on your nerves; 
you start feeling tired of it, bored with it. 
 
Yes, to a certain extent you can tolerate it; 
beyond that it becomes impossible. 
 
How long can you go on hugging your woman? 
 
Yes, for a few moments it is beautiful, ecstatic, 
but how long? 
 
One minute, two minutes, thirty minutes, sixty minutes, one day, two days? 
 
How long? 
 
You try next time, 
and you will be able to note the point where happiness turns into unhappiness.
 
 
 
When you want to get hold of a woman you are so allured, attracted. 
 
And women know it intuitively, 
hence they do everything to escape from your hands. 
 
They remain elusive, 
they don't become too readily available. 
 
They are aware 
 
-- intuitively aware, 
not intellectually -- 
 
intuitively aware of the phenomenon that 
all this attraction will be gone soon 
and all this great love will die soon. 
 
 
 
Everything dies; 
everything that is born is bound to die.
 
They are far more intelligent that way
-- they avoid, they escape. 
 
They allow you only a certain amount of intimacy, 
and then they are again far away. 
 
That keeps the game going; 
otherwise every game will be finished too soon. 
 
Any happiness is only for the time being. 
 
Beyond that it turns into the opposite; 
it becomes sour, bitter. 
 
 
 
Peace means going beyond the excitement of happiness and unhappiness both. 
 
 
 
There are people who are attracted to unhappiness too; 
modern psychology calls them masochists. 
 
They enjoy torturing themselves. 
 
In the past these same masochists became great MAHATMAS, great sages, saints. 
 
Psychologically understood, 
with the modern insight into human mind, 
your so-called saints will look 
-- almost ninety percent of them -- 
masochistic, 
or maybe ninety-nine percent even. 
 
If looked at deeply, 
you will find these are people who enjoy torturing themselves. 
 
These are people who go on long fasts, 
lie down on the bed of thorns, 
stand in the hot sun or in the cold, 
sit naked in the Himalayan snows. 
These are the masochists.
 
 
 
And the other side of it is sadism. 
 
There are people who enjoy torturing others. 
 
 
 
And in fact the whole humanity 
-- almost the whole humanity, 
except the buddhas -- 
can be divided into these two camps. 
 
These are the real two religions of the world: 
masochism and sadism. 
 
The masochists become religious 
and the sadists become politicians. 
 
 
 
Alexander the Great, 
Tamerlane, 
Nadirshah, 
Genghis Khan, 
Mussolini, 
Joseph Stalin, 
Mao Zedong, 
all these people, they enjoy torturing others. 
 
To torture others is as pathological as to torture oneself.
 
The person who wants happiness is bound to be sadistic. 
 
 
 
Analyze your happiness, on what it depends. 
 
If you have a bigger house than your neighbor you are happy. 
 
In fact, you are torturing your neighbor by having a bigger house: 
it is a very subtle torture.
 
I used to stay in one of the most beautiful palaces in Calcutta. 
It was a beauty, a very old Victorian colonial palace it was, 
and it was the best house in Calcutta. 
The man was very proud of it, 
and whenever I would stay with him 
he was continuously talking about the house, and the garden, and this and that 
-- but it was around the house, his whole talk.
 
Once it happened, 
I stayed with him for three days 
and he didn't mention the house at all.
 
I said, 
"What has happened? 
Have you become a sannyasin or something? 
Have you renounced the world? 
You are not talking about the house!"
 
He looked with sad eyes towards me and said, 
"Can't you see the new house that has come up in the neighborhood?"
 
I had seen the house. 
A new marble house had come up, 
and certainly it was bigger and far more beautiful. 
And he said, 
 
"Since this house has come up all my joy is lost. 
I am living in such misery, you cannot conceive."
 
I said, 
"But you are living in the same house! 
It is the SAME house, and you were so happy. 
And you are still in the same house. 
 
Why should you be so miserable? 
What does it have to do with the neighbor? 
 
And if it is because of the neighbor that you are feeling so miserable, 
 
then remember one thing: 
when you used to feel so happy about the house, 
it was also not about the house 
-- it was about the neighbors, 
because they were living in small houses. 
 
And if you are so much tortured by the neighbor's house, 
remember, 
the neighbor must have been in a long long torture 
because of your house. 
 
It is just to take revenge that he has made the new house."
 
The new house-owner invited me for dinner. 
 
He asked my host also to come, 
but my host simply said, 
 
"No, I cannot -- I am too busy." 
 
And he was not busy at all! 
 
And when the man had gone I said to him, 
 
"You are not busy."
 
He said, 
 
"I am not busy, 
but I cannot go into that house
-- unless I have made a bigger house than that. 
Yes, wait! 
It will take two, three years for me to make a bigger house, 
but it is a question of prestige. 
Once I have made a bigger house I will invite that man for dinner."
 
 
 
This is how people are living.
 
If you watch your own mind, 
you enjoy things 
because others don't have them. 
 
You enjoy them not having them, 
you don't enjoy your having them.
 
 
 
Such is the pathology of man: 
 
one is a sadist, 
he enjoys others being in a state of misery; 
and the other turns into a masochist. 
 
Seeing that it is not good to enjoy others' misery, 
seeing that it is a sin, 
seeing that he will have to suffer in hell for it, 
becoming aware that this is not virtuous, 
he turns into a masochist, 
he starts torturing himself. 
But the torture continues.
 
 
 
Peace means 
a state of inner health, 
a state of inner wholeness, 
where you are not torturing others, not torturing yourself, 
where you are neither interested in happiness nor in unhappiness. 
 
You are simply interested in being absolutely 
silent, 
calm
quiet, 
collected, 
integrated.
 
Yes, when the mind is dropped... 
 
and mind means 
your whole past 
and all that you know 
and all that you have accumulated. 
 
Mind is 
your subtle treasure, 
your subtle possession. 
 
When all that mind has been dropped 
and you have entered into a state of no-mind, 
a great peace descends. 
 
It is silence, 
 
it is full of bliss, but Buddha avoids the word. 
 
I don't avoid it.
 
 
 
Buddha had to avoid it, 
because in Buddha's days bliss was talked about too much. 
 
The Upanishads were talking about it, 
Mahavira was talking about it, 
the whole Hindu tradition was talking about it. 
 
SAT-CHIT-ANAND 
-- God is truth, consciousness, bliss, 
but the ultimate quality is bliss. 
 
Too much talk about bliss. 
 
Buddha must have felt that it is better not to use that word. 
 
That word has become too orthodox, too conventional, too conformist. 
 
And because it has been used so much 
it has lost its meaning, 
its savor, 
its salt, 
it has lost its beauty. 
 
 
 
But now it can be revived again; 
now nobody is talking about bliss.
 
But whether you call it peace or bliss is irrelevant. 
 
 
 
Just understand one thing: 
that it takes you beyond all dualities. 
 
Day and night, 
summer and winter, 
life and death, 
pain and pleasure 
 
-- it takes you beyond all dualities -- 
 
love and hate. 
 
It takes you beyond all dual phenomena. 
It takes you to the one.
 
 
 
Hence Buddha says: 
 
 
 
ONE WORD. 
 
 
 
It is a simple, melodious, harmonious state of your inner health, inner sanity. 
 
One word is enough, far more significant. 
 
 
 
BETTER THAN A THOUSAND HOLLOW WORDS....
 
BETTER THAN A THOUSAND HOLLOW VERSES IS ONE VERSE THAT BRINGS PEACE.
 
 
 
There are poets and poets. 
 
There are two kinds of poets in the world. 
 
One is the poet 
who is a dreamer, 
who is very clever in imagination, in fantasy. 
 
He creates works of art, 
he creates sculpture, music, poetry, 
but all that remains dream stuff. 
 
It may entertain you for the time being, 
but it cannot give you any insight into reality. 
 
It may be a consolation, a solace, a lullaby; 
it may have a tranquilizing effect on you. 
 
Yes, that's exactly what it does. 
 
All that is called aesthetics, art... 
has a tranquilizing effect on you. 
 
Listening to classical music you fall into a totally different kind of state. 
 
Everything becomes tranquil, still, 
but it is momentary; 
it is only a dream world that the musician creates around you. 
 
Listening to poetry 
or looking at great sculpture, 
for a moment you are dazed, stunned. 
 
The mind stops as if you are transported for a moment to some other world, 
 
but again you are back in the same old world, in the same old rut.
 
 
 
But there are different kinds of poets, painters, sculptors too: 
the buddhas. 
 
A single verse from them may transform you forever. 
 
Listening to a buddha is listening to divine music. 
 
Listening to a buddha is listening to God himself. 
 
A buddha is God visible, 
a buddha is God available.
A buddha is a window into God, 
an invitation from the beyond. 
 
 
 
Milton, 
Kalidas, 
Bhavabhuti, 
and thousands of others 
-- these are the dreamers, great dreamers; 
beautiful are their dreams, 
 
but they are not the poets who can transform your being. 
 
Mohammed can do it, 
Christ can do it, 
Krishna can do it, 
Buddha can do it, 
Kabir, 
Nanak, 
Farid, 
yes, these people can do it.
 
 
 
What is the difference between the poetry of a Kabir and a Shakespeare
 
As far as poetry is concerned, 
Shakespeare is far more poetic, 
remember, than Kabir. 
 
Kabir knows nothing of the art. 
 
Shakespeare is very sophisticated; 
 
but still a single verse from Kabir is far more valuable than all the collected works of Shakespeare 
 
-- because a single word from Kabir 
comes from insight, 
not from fantasy.
 
That is the difference. 
 
 
 
Kabir has clarity, 
he has eyes which can see into the beyond. 
 
 
 
Shakespeare is as blind as you are. 
 
Of course, he is very efficient in bringing his fantasy into words. 
 
That's art, worthy of respect, 
but at the most it can entertain you. 
 
It can keep you occupied beautifully, 
but there is no possibility of transformation happening through it. 
 
Even Shakespeare is not a transformed being, 
how can he transform you?
 
 
 
Only a buddha, 
only one who is awakened, 
can wake you up. 
 
 
 
Shakespeare is as fast asleep as you are, 
or maybe even deeper asleep than you are, 
because he is having such beautiful dreams. 
 
His sleep is bound to be deep, 
because he is not only having dreams, 
he is singing his dreams. 
 
He is bringing his dreams to expression 
-- and still his sleep is not broken.
 
 
 
Buddha is one who is awakened. 
 
Only one who is awake can wake you up. 
 
 
 
BETTER THAN A THOUSAND HOLLOW VERSES IS ONE VERSE THAT BRINGS PEACE.
 
 
 
And how will you know that 
you are around a buddha? 
 
His very presence will bring transcendental peace to you.
 
So a buddha from the past cannot be of much help, 
because his words will again be hollow words; 
he will not be present in them. 
 
It will only be a beautiful cage, 
a golden cage studded with diamonds, 
but the bird has left the cage long ago.
 
A buddha is significant only when he is alive, 
because only his aliveness can trigger a process in you which will lead you ultimately to awakening.
 
 
 
BETTER THAN A HUNDRED HOLLOW LINES IS ONE LINE OF THE LAW, BRINGING PEACE.
 
 
 
By law, 
Buddha does not mean any moral, social, political law. 
 
By law 
Buddha means dhamma: 
 
AES DHAMMO SANANTANO 
-- the ultimate law, 
the eternal law, 
the law that makes this universe a cosmos instead of a chaos, 
the law that runs the whole universe in such tremendous harmony.
 
 
 
BETTER THAN A THOUSAND HOLLOW LINES.... 
 
 
 
"Lines" is not really a good translation. 
 
The original word is SUTRA: 
 
sutra literally means thread. 
 
 
 
And in the East the greatest statements of the masters have been called sutras, threads, for a certain reason. 
 
A man is born as a heap of flowers, just as a heap. 
 
Unless threads are used and the thread runs through the flowers, 
the heap will remain a heap and will never become a garland.
 
And you can be offered to God 
only when you have become a garland. 
 
A heap is a chaos, 
a garland is a cosmos 
 
-- although in the garland you also only see the flowers, the thread is invisible.
 
The sayings of the masters are called sutras, threads, 
because they can make out of you a garland. 
 
And only when you are a garland 
you can become an offering to God, 
 
only when you have become a cosmos, a harmony, a song.
 
 
 
Right now you are just gibberish. 
 
You can write down... sit in a room, 
close the door 
and start writing on a paper whatsoever comes to your mind. 
 
Don't edit it, 
don't delete anything, 
don't add anything, 
because you are not going to show it to anybody. 
 
Keep a matchbox by the side 
so once you have written it 
you can burn it immediately, 
so that you can be authentic. 
 
Just write whatsoever comes to your mind 
and you will be surprised: 
 
just a ten minutes' exercise 
and you will understand what I mean when I say that you are just gibberish.
 
It is really a great revelation to see how your mind goes on jumping from here to there, 
from one thing to another thing, accidentally, for no reason at all. 
 
What nonsense thoughts go on running inside you, 
with no relevance, no consistency. 
 
Just a sheer wastage, a leakage of energy!
 
 
 
The sayings of the buddhas are called sutras. 
 
Here the translator has used the word 'line' for sutra. 
 
Linguistically it is okay, 
but these are not linguistic matters. 
 
That is one of the great problems: 
to translate statements of Buddha, Christ, Krishna, is really almost an impossible job. 
 
And those who translate them are not awakened people themselves; 
they are great orientalists, linguists, grammarians. 
 
They know the original language, 
but they only know the language 
-- and language is not the real point, 
it is only the garment.
 
So remember: 
 
 
 
BETTER THAN A HUNDRED HOLLOW LINES 
 
means 
 
BETTER THAN A HUNDRED HOLLOW SUTRAS 
 
-- logical, philosophical, proposed by great philosophers and thinkers, 
 
but they are hollow 
because they don't contain the experience.
 
 
 
... IS ONE LINE OF THE LAW 
-- a single sutra of the law. 
 
 
 
Who can assert the sutra of the law? 
 
Only one who has become awakened, 
only one who has become one with the ultimate law, 
only one who has himself become the dhamma. 
 
 
 
Not a religious person 
but one who himself has become religion itself. 
 
 
 
And how will you judge? 
 
-- the same criterion continues: 
it brings peace.
 
 
 
Why are you here with me? 
 
Be here only if my presence brings peace to you. 
 
Be here only if listening to me a chord starts vibrating in you which brings peace. 
 
Be here only if your love for me helps you to transcend the world of dualities; 
 
otherwise being here is of no use.
 
 
 
My presence cannot be for all; 
 
it can be only for the chosen few, 
only for those who have really come thirsty, inquiring, 
who really want to risk all to know God, 
who are ready to die for truth, 
who are ready to become sacrifices.
 
 
 
IT IS BETTER TO CONQUER YOURSELF THAN TO WIN A THOUSAND BATTLES.
 
 
 
And in peace is victory. 
 
When peace surrounds you within and without, 
you are overflowing with peace, 
you have come home, 
you have conquered yourself, 
you are a master.
 
 
 
IT IS BETTER TO CONQUER YOURSELF THAN TO WIN A THOUSAND BATTLES. 
 
 
 
One buddha is far more significant 
and valuable than a million Adolf Hitlers. 
 
And this victory is something which is a real victory, 
because all other victories will be taken away from you. 
 
 
 
Alexander the Great dies like any beggar dies; 
he cannot take anything with him. 
He has conquered the whole world, 
and now going as a beggar....
 
It is said: 
 
there are three instances in Alexander's life which are significant. 
One is the meeting with the great mystic, Diogenes. 
 
Diogenes was laying naked on the bank of a river taking a sunbath. 
 
It was early morning... 
and the early sun 
and the beautiful riverbank 
and the cool sand. 
 
And Alexander was passing by; 
he was coming to India. 
 
Somebody told him,   
 
"Diogenes is just close by and you have always been inquiring about Diogenes" 
 
-- because he had heard many stories about the man. 
 
He was really a man worth calling a man! 
 
Even Alexander, deep down, was jealous of Diogenes.
 
He went to see him. 
 
He was impressed by his beauty 
-- naked, undecorated, with no ornaments. 
 
And he himself was full of ornaments, decorated in every possible way, 
but he looked very poor before Diogenes. 
 
And he said to Diogenes, 
 
"I feel jealous of you. 
I look poor compared to you 
-- and you have nothing! 
What is your richness?"
 
And Diogenes said, 
 
"I don't desire anything 
-- desirelessness is my treasure
 
I am a master 
because I don't possess anything 
-- nonpossessiveness is my mastery, 
and I have conquered the world 
because I have conquered myself. 
 
And my victory is going with me, 
and your victory will be taken away by death."
 
 
 
And the second story: 
 
When he was going back from India.... 
His teacher had told him, 
 
"When you come back from India, bring a sannyasin, 
because that is the greatest contribution of India to the world."
 
The phenomenon of a sannyasin is uniquely Indian. 
 
Nowhere else has the idea of transcending the world totally captured the minds of people as it has in this country. 
 
Aristotle was the teacher of Alexander. 
 
Aristotle had asked him, 
 
"Bring a sannyasin when you come back. 
I would like to see what a sannyasin is like, 
what it is all about." 
 
After conquering India, 
when he was going back he remembered. 
 
He inquired where to find a sannyasin. 
People said, 
 
"Sannyasins are many 
but real sannyasins are very few. 
We know one."
 
In Alexandrian reports his name is given as Dandamesh 
-- it may be a Greek form of some Indian name. 
 
Alexander went to see the man 
-- again the same beauty as Diogenes, 
the same peace. 
 
Whenever awakening happens it brings something similar. 
 
Around every buddha you will find the same spring, 
the same fragrance, 
the same peace.
 
Again, as he entered into the energy field of Dandamesh, 
he was tremendously affected, 
as if he had entered into a perfumed garden. 
 
He remembered Diogenes immediately. 
 
He asked Dandamesh, 
 
"I have come to invite you -- come with me. 
You will be our royal guest, 
every comfort will be provided for, 
but you have to come with me to Athens."
 
Dandamesh said, 
 
"I have dropped all coming, all going." 
 
He was talking of something else; 
Alexander could not understand immediately. 
He was saying that, 
 
"Now there is no more coming in the world 
and no more going out of the world. 
I have transcended all coming and going." 
 
What in the East we call AVAGAMAN 
-- coming and going; 
coming into the womb 
and then going into death.
 
Alexander said, 
 
"But this is a commandment 
-- I command you! 
You have to follow. 
This is the order from the great Alexander!"
 
Dandamesh laughed. 
 
The same laughter 
-- again Alexander remembered Diogenes -- 
the same laughter. 
 
Dandamesh said, 
 
"Nobody can command me, 
not even death." 
 
Alexander said, 
 
"You don't understand 
-- I am a dangerous man!" 
 
He pulled out his sword and he said, 
 
"Either you will come with me or I will cut off your head."   
 
Dandamesh said, 
 
"Do it, cut off the head 
-- because what you are going to do now,
I have done years before. 
When the head falls, 
you will see it falling on the earth 
and I will also see it falling on the earth."
 
Alexander said, 
 
"How will you see it? You will be dead!"
 
Dandamesh said, 
 
"That is the point: 
I cannot die anymore, 
I have become a witness. 
 
I will witness my death as much as you will witness. 
 
It will happen between us two 
-- you will be seeing, 
I will be seeing. 
 
And my purpose in the body is fulfilled:
I have attained. 
 
There is no need for the body to exist anymore. 
Cut off the head!"
 
Alexander had to put his sword back in the sheath 
-- you cannot kill such a man.
 
 
 
And the third story is:
 
When Alexander was dying he remembered both Diogenes and Dandamesh, 
and he remembered their laughter, their peace, their joy.
 
And he remembered that they had something that goes beyond death,
 
"And I have nothing."
 
He wept, tears came to his eyes, 
and he said to his ministers,
 
"When I die and you carry my body to the cemetery, let my hands hang out of the casket."
 
The ministers asked, 
 
"But this is not the tradition! 
Why? Why such a strange request?" 
 
Alexander said, 
 
"I would like people to see that I came empty-handed 
and I am going empty-handed, 
and all my life has been a wastage. 
 
Let my hands hang out of the casket 
so everybody can see 
-- even Alexander the Great is going empty-handed."
 
 
 
These stories are worth meditating on.
 
Buddha says: 
 
 
 
IT IS BETTER TO CONQUER YOURSELF THAN TO WIN A THOUSAND BATTLES.
THEN THE VICTORY IS YOURS.
 
 
 
No other victory is yours. 
 
It can't be taken from you 
-- that's why it is yours.
 
 
 
IT CANNOT BE TAKEN FROM YOU, 
NOT BY ANGELS OR BY DEMONS, 
HEAVEN OR HELL.
 
 
 
Nobody can take it away from you. 
 
Remember, 
only that which cannot be taken away from you is yours. 
 
Anything that can be taken away from you is not yours. 
 
Don't cling to it, 
because the clinging will bring misery to you. 
 
Do not be possessive of anything that can be taken away from you 
because your possessiveness will create anguish for you. 
 
Abide with that which is really yours, 
which nobody can take away from you. 
 
It cannot be stolen, 
you cannot be robbed of it, 
you cannot go bankrupt as far as it is concerned. 
 
Even death cannot take it.
 
 
 
Krishna says: 
 
NAINAM CHHINDANTI SHASTRANI 
-- you cannot cut it by weapons, 
swords cannot penetrate it, 
arrows cannot reach to it, 
bullets are absolutely powerless as far as it is concerned. 
 
NAINAM DAHATI PAVAKAH 
-- neither fire can burn it. 
 
When on a funeral pyre your body will be burned, 
YOU will not be burned 
-- if you have known yourself, 
if you have understood what this consciousness is within you. 
 
If you have conquered your consciousness, 
then the body will be burned, turned to ashes, 
but you will not be burned, 
you will not be touched even. 
 
You will remain forever 
-- you are eternal. 
 
But this eternity can be known only when you become a master on your own.
 
Don't waste your time 
in mastering others, 
in conquering power, prestige, 
in conquering the world. 
 
Conquer yourself. 
 
The only thing worth conquering is your own being.
 
 
 
BETTER THAN A HUNDRED YEARS OF WORSHIP,
BETTER THAN A THOUSAND OFFERINGS,
BETTER THAN GIVING UP A THOUSAND WORLDLY WAYS IN ORDER TO WIN MERIT,
BETTER EVEN THAN TENDING IN THE FOREST
A SACRED FLAME FOR A HUNDRED YEARS --
IS ONE MOMENT'S REVERENCE
FOR THE MAN WHO HAS CONQUERED HIMSELF.
 
 
 
A tremendously significant sutra. 
Meditate over it slowly. 
 
 
 
BETTER THAN A HUNDRED YEARS OF WORSHIP... 
 
IS a single MOMENT'S REVERENCE FOR THE MAN WHO HAS CONQUERED HIMSELF. 
 
 
 
Why? 
 
-- because in the temples you will be worshipping just stones. 
 
And by worshipping the stones 
 
-- either in the temple or in Kaaba -- 
 
by worshipping statues and pictures, 
by worshipping dead scriptures, 
following rituals and formalities, 
you will not have any taste of buddhahood.
 
 
 
But ONE MOMENT'S REVERENCE FOR THE MAN WHO HAS CONQUERED HIMSELF is far more valuable. 
 
 
 
Why? 
 
-- because the moment you bow down to the man who has conquered himself, 
the moment you bow down to a buddha, 
something of the buddha, 
something of the vibe penetrates you, 
stirs your asleep heart, 
penetrates your being like a ray of light into the dark night of your soul, 
brings you the first glimpse of the divine.
 
It is not possible 
in the temples, 
in the mosques, 
in the churches, 
in the synagogues, 
in the gurudwaras. 
 
It is possible if you are in the vicinity of a Nanak, 
but not in a gurudwara. 
 
It is possible if you are in a love affair with Jesus, 
but not in a church. 
 
It is possible if you have surrendered to a buddha, 
if you have said to a buddha, 
"BUDDHAM SHARANAM GACHCHHAMI 
-- I go to the feet of the Buddha, I surrender myself." 
 
But it is not possible in a Buddhist temple; 
before the statue of Buddha it is not possible. 
 
 
 
You will have to find a living buddha 
-- there is no other way. 
 
There is no shortcut.
 
 
 
BETTER THAN A THOUSAND OFFERINGS, 
BETTER THAN GIVING UP A THOUSAND WORLDLY WAYS... 
IS ONE MOMENT'S REVERENCE FOR THE MAN WHO HAS CONQUERED HIMSELF.
 
 
 
Why do you worship in the first place? 
 
Why do you offer flowers, food to the statues? 
 
Why do you renounce A THOUSAND WORLDLY WAYS? 
 
-- because of greed and fear. 
 
Either it is fear or it is greed, 
or maybe it is both, 
because greed and fear are not different 
-- two aspects of the same coin. 
 
Greed is fear hidden, 
fear is greed hidden.
 
 
 
And not only the worldly people are greedy, 
the so-called otherworldly are also as greedy 
or maybe they are even more greedy. 
 
Their greed is such that it cannot be satisfied by this world. 
 
Their greed is such that they are desiring heavenly pleasures: 
only paradise can satisfy them, 
this world is not enough. 
 
And that's what your so-called saints go on teaching to you. 
They say,
 
"Why are you wasting your time in momentary pleasures? 
Follow us! 
We will show you the way to find pleasures which will last forever."
 
But this is pure greed! 
 
The worldly man seems to be less greedy 
because he is satisfied with the momentary, 
 
and the otherworldly is so greedy that 
he wants something permanent which lasts forever. 
 
The worldly is greedy, 
the otherworldly is greedy.
 
Your priests are very greedy people, 
your monks are very greedy people.
 
 
 
One day a Protestant minister came into Bonatelli's barbershop and got a haircut. 
When Bonatelli was finished, the minister reached for his wallet 
but the barber shook his head and smiled. 
 
"Put-a your wallet away, Reverend," 
 
said the Italian. 
 
"I never charge a man of the cloth."
 
The minister thanked him and left, 
but he soon returned and presented the pious barber with a Bible.
 
A few hours later, Father Rourke entered the Italian's shop and he, too, got a haircut. 
 
Once again the barber refused to accept any payment. 
 
"Forget it, Father," 
 
he said. 
 
"I no take-a money from a priest."
 
Father Rourke left shortly thereafter 
and returned with a crucifix which he presented to Bonatelli as a token of his appreciation.
 
Toward evening a rabbi entered the shop. 
He also got a haircut. 
When the rabbi reached into his pocket, 
the barber waved the money aside. 
 
"That's okay, Rabbi," 
 
said Bonatelli. 
 
"I no accept-a pay from men who do-a da Lord-a's work."
 
So the rabbi left, 
and came back with another rabbi!
 
 
 
People live through greed or through fear. 
 
A few people are afraid of hell, 
hence they are worshipping; 
and a few people are greedy for heaven, 
hence they are worshipping.
 
 
 
A Sufi story says:
 
Jesus came into a town. 
He saw a few people sitting very sad, in deep agony; 
he had never seen such a lot of sad people. 
He asked, 
 
"What has happened to you? 
What calamity has fallen upon you?"
 
And they said, 
 
"We are afraid of hell, we are trembling. 
We don't know how we can save ourselves from hell
-- that is our fear, 
that is our constant agony. 
We cannot sleep, we cannot rest, 
unless we have found a way."
 
Jesus walked away from those people. 
Just a little further ahead he found another group sitting under a tree, very sad, in great anxiety, just as the first lot. 
 
Jesus was very puzzled. He asked, 
 
"What is the matter? 
What is happening in this town? 
Why are you looking so sad? 
Why do you look so tense? 
You will go mad if you remain in this state any longer! 
What has happened to you?"
 
They said, 
 
"Nothing has happened to us. 
We are afraid that we may lose heaven, 
we may not be able to enter it. 
And we have to get it, whatsoever the cost. 
That is our anxiety and that is our tension."
 
Jesus left those people also. 
 
Sufis say: 
 
Why did Jesus leave these people? 
 
-- because these are the religious people! 
 
He should have taught them the way to avoid hell, 
and how to enter heaven, 
but he simply turned away from them.
 
He found a third group in a garden, 
a small group of people who were dancing, singing, rejoicing. 
He asked, 
 
"What ceremony is going on? 
What festival are you having?"
 
They said, 
 
"No special ceremony 
-- just our gratefulness to God, 
gratefulness for what he has given to us. 
We were not worthy of it."
 
Jesus said, 
 
"To you I will talk, with you I will stay. 
You are my people."
 
 
 
This story is not related to Christians, 
but the Sufis have a few beautiful stories about Jesus. 
 
In fact, they understand Jesus far more deeply than the so-called orthodox church. 
 
This is a beautiful story. 
 
It says neither those who are living through fear 
nor those who are living through greed are going to enter into the kingdom of God, 
but only those who are living in tremendous joy, thankfulness and gratitude.
 
 
 
And where will you learn gratitude? 
 
If you have not seen a buddha, 
you will not know what gratitude is. 
 
Where will you learn to celebrate if you have not come across a buddha? 
 
A buddha is celebration, 
a buddha is a festival, 
an ongoing festivity, 
a dance that goes on and on, 
that knows no ending, a song that continues forever.
 
If you have come across a buddha, 
then a moment's reverence, says Buddha, is enough. 
 
 
 
Drop all your fear, 
drop all your greed. 
 
Learn how to be a disciple. 
 
Learn how to imbibe the spirit of someone 
who has reached his innermost center, 
who does not live anymore on the circumference, 
who has become enlightened, 
whose being is a light.
 
Learn to open your eyes towards that light. 
 
 
 
Learn to say: 
 
BUDDHAM SHARANAM GACHCHHAMI, 
SANGHAM SHARANAM GACHCHHAMI, 
DHAMMAM SHARANAM GACHCHHAMI. 
 
Three surrenders: 
 
one surrender to the one who has become awakened; 
 
the second surrender is to the company who lives in the company of the awakened 
-- because the perfume of the awakened one starts filtering into the company, 
the blessed company that lives with the awakened one; 
 
and the third surrender is to the law, the ultimate law, 
through which the sleepy one has become awakened 
and the other sleepy ones are becoming awakened.
 
 
 
These three surrenders... 
and a single moment's reverence is more valuable than a hundred years of worship, 
than a thousand offerings....
 
 
 
BETTER THAN GIVING UP A THOUSAND WORLDLY WAYS IN ORDER TO WIN MERIT, 
BETTER EVEN THAN TENDING IN THE FOREST A SACRED FLAME FOR A HUNDRED YEARS 
-- IS ONE MOMENT'S REVERENCE FOR THE MAN WHO HAS CONQUERED HIMSELF.
TO REVERE SUCH A MAN,
A MASTER OLD IN VIRTUE AND HOLINESS,
IS TO HAVE VICTORY OVER LIFE ITSELF, AND BEAUTY, 
STRENGTH AND HAPPINESS.
 
 
 
To revere such a person is to know the secretmost phenomenon in existence. 
 
Bowing down to a buddha a miracle happens: 
something starts flowing from the buddha to the heart of the disciple, an invisible river, a river of light.
 
 
 
A MASTER OLD IN VIRTUE AND HOLINESS.... 
 
 
 
What does this sutra mean: 
OLD IN VIRTUE AND HOLINESS? 
 
There is a paradox: 
 
holiness is as new as the dewdrops in the early morning sun on the lotus leaf
and holiness is as ancient as the Himalayas. 
 
It is both, 
because it is eternal. 
 
It is from the beginning to the end, 
but it is new, too, 
every moment new, 
renewing itself. 
 
It is not a dead thing just sitting there; 
it is an alive process. 
 
It is not a stagnant pool, 
it is a river rushing towards the ocean. 
 
So it is new every moment; 
hence every buddha is young forever.
 
Have you ever seen any statue of Buddha as an old man of eighty-two years? 
 
No. 
 
Have you ever seen any statue of Mahavira as old, or Rama, or Krishna as old? 
 
There are no statues of Buddha, Krishna, or Mahavira as old, 
although they all lived to a very old age, 
all passed the age of eighty. 
 
Why don't we have their statues as old men? 
 
To represent the eternal youth of truth, 
the eternal freshness of truth.
 
And still what they say is the ancientmost: 
 
AES DHAMMO SANANTANO... 
so ancient that in fact there has never been a beginning. 
 
SANANTANO means beginningless 
-- forever it has been.
 
 
 
To represent this there is told another phenomenon: 
 
Lao Tzu is said to have been born old. 
 
Buddha died when he was eighty-two 
and Lao Tzu was born when he was eighty- two. 
 
He was born eighty-two years old; 
he lived in his mother's womb for eighty-two years. 
 
A beautiful story. 
 
Not that he really lived 
-- because one has to think of the woman also! -- 
but it says something. 
 
It says that truth is so ancient, 
it is always old. 
 
These stories are beautiful.
 
 
 
It is said that when Zarathustra was born... 
he is the only child in the whole history of humanity about whom such a story is told. 
 
When he was born
-- every child cries when he is born -- 
Zarathustra laughed. 
 
Beautiful! 
 
Not that he could have really done it. 
 
No child can do it 
-- it is physiologically impossible -- 
the child has to cry. 
 
Through crying he clears his chest 
and the breathing system. 
 
He cannot laugh, 
he cannot even breathe; 
first he has to cry.
 
If the child does not cry for a few seconds, a few minutes, 
that means he is not going to live at all. 
 
Then he has to be forced. 
 
The doctor hangs him upside down 
and gives him a good slap on the bottom to help him cry. 
 
If he cries, that means he is going to live. 
 
If he cries, that clears the chest
-- because much mucus gathers in the chest while he is in the mother's womb. 
 
He does not breathe in the mother's womb 
so the whole breathing system remains clogged with mucus. 
 
So each child physiologically has to cry; 
through crying he gets rid of the mucus. 
 
Laughter is not possible.
 
But it is very symbolic that Zarathustra laughed. 
 
What does it symbolize? 
 
It symbolizes that this whole life is just illusory, 
only worth laughing at.
 
It is ridiculous! 
 
He knows from the very beginning it is ridiculous. 
 
The real life is something totally different.
 
 
 
TO REVERE SUCH A MAN,
A MASTER OLD IN VIRTUE AND HOLINESS, 
IS TO HAVE VICTORY OVER LIFE ITSELF.... 
 
 
 
By revering a buddha, 
by respecting a buddha, 
by trusting a buddha, 
you are conquering life itself. 
 
And you will attain to beauty, strength and happiness. 
 
In that surrender you will become beautiful, 
because the ego is gone 
and the ego is ugly. 
 
And you will become strong, 
because the ego is gone 
-- the ego is always weak and impotent. 
 
And you will become happy for the first time, 
because for the first time you have seen a glimpse of truth, 
for the first time you have seen a glimpse of your own being. 
 
The buddha is a mirror: 
when you bow down you see your original face reflected in the buddha.
 
Let your heart be full of the prayer:
 
BUDDHAM SHARANAM GACHCHHAMI,
SANGHAM SHARANAM GACHCHHAMI,
DHAMMAM SHARANAM GACHCHHAMI.
 
 
 
Enough for today.
 
 
 
Continue to The Dhammapada: The Way of the Buddha, Vol 3 chapter 10 ‘Vast as the sky’…
 
 
 
from osho talks
 
The Dhammapada: The Way of the Buddha, Vol 3
 
Talks given from 11/08/79 am to 21/08/79 am
English Discourse series
 
chapter 9 : A small candle
 
20 August 1979 am in Buddha Hall
 
If you would like to read it in PDF,
there is a free download of this all osho discourses from OSHO RAJNEESH,
please click here.
 
 
 
f:id:premmashal:20181227111740j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227111736j:image
 
about subtle body and chakra
yoga : the alpha and the omega, vol 9 ch1
 
f:id:premmashal:20181227111950j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112058j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112000j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227111944j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112012j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227111956j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112053j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112008j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112031j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112102j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112040j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112004j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227111931j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227111935j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227111926j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112036j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112045j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112027j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112049j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112018j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227112023j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181227111940j:image
 
 
 
In this blog, I also shared osho discourse of 
the Tao's 'The secret of the Golden Flower
黄金の華の秘密(太乙金華宗旨)'
and 'The Tao Te Ching 道徳経' by Lao Tzu 老子.
These two show you the way to the enlightenment.
 
If you are interested
please take a look and enjoy!
 
f:id:premmashal:20181227112332j:image
The secret of the Golden Flower
黄金の華の秘密(太乙金華宗旨)
 
f:id:premmashal:20181227112422j:image
The Tao Te Ching 
道徳経 by Lao Tzu 老子
 
 
 
beloved osho
beloved gautam buddha 
beloved all enlightened masters
beloved all
 
 
 
”The last word of Buddha was, sammasati. 
Remember that you are a buddha – sammasati.”
 
 
 
sammasati
It means right remembrance.
 
 
 
meditation & love
 
 
 
osho samadhi समाधिः
 
f:id:premmashal:20181227112459j:image
f:id:premmashal:20181227112532j:image

Osho Zen Tarot

Osho Zen Tarot

  • Osho International Corp.
  • ライフスタイル
  • ¥960

OSHO Transformation Tarot

OSHO Transformation Tarot

  • Osho International Corp.
  • エンターテインメント
  • ¥960

The Dhammapada Vol. 3: The Way of the Buddha

The Dhammapada Vol. 3: The Way of the Buddha

  • Osho
  • 宗教/スピリチュアル
  • ¥900

ch8 : The Dhammapada: The Way of the Buddha, Vol 3

f:id:premmashal:20181227112847j:image
 
'And in no-mind you will know the ultimate truth, DHAMMA.
And moving from mind to no-mind is the step, PADA. 
And this is the whole secret of THE DHAMMAPADA.'
 
 
 
ch8 : The Dhammapada: The Way of the Buddha, Vol 3
 
chapter 8
A good belly laughter
 
19 August 1979 am in Buddha Hall
 
 
 
The first question:
Question 1
BELOVED MASTER,
YOU GRACIOUSLY SENT ME A TAPED ANSWER TO A QUESTION LAST AUTUMN. 
THE GIST OF YOUR ANSWER WAS THAT I WAS TRYING TOO HARD AT SPIRITUAL PURSUITS. 
I STOPPED ALMOST EVERYTHING FOR NINE MONTHS AND GOT GOOD RESULTS FROM FOLLOWING YOUR ADVICE.
NOW I AM ATTENDING A SANNYASIN GROUP AGAIN, 
BUT I FEEL THAT BECOMING A SANNYASIN WOULD BE DOING WHAT YOU TOLD ME NOT TO DO -- TRYING TOO HARD. 
I HAVE ALREADY BEEN INITIATED INTO MANY GROUPS 
AND FEEL THAT THIS MAY BE SYMPTOMATIC OF TRYING TOO HARD. 
SHOULD I JUST RELAX AND ENJOY YOU THE WAY WE ARE NOW?
 
 
 
Mariel Strauss, that's exactly what sannyas is: 
 
relaxing and enjoying whatsoever is.
 
It is not an initiation like other initiations you have been through 
-- it is a totally different phenomenon. 
 
It is not a serious affair at all, 
it is basically playfulness. 
 
It is for the first time on the earth that we are trying to bring playfulness to religion.
 
 
 
Religion has always been of a long face, sad, serious, somber. 
 
Because of that seriousness, 
millions of people have remained aloof from religion. 
 
Those who were alive could not become religious 
because religion meant a kind of suicide to them -- and it was so. 
 
Those who were already dead or dying, 
those who were ill, pathological, suicidal, 
only they were interested in the old religions.
 
The old religions were not dancing, singing, celebrating; 
they were 
anti-life, 
anti-earth, 
anti-body. 
 
They were purely negative; 
they had nothing to affirm. 
 
Their God was based on negativity. 
 
Go on negating: 
the more you negate life, 
the more religious you were thought to be.
 
 
 
I am bringing a totally new vision of religion to the earth: 
 
I am introducing you to a religion that can laugh, 
a religion that can love, 
a religion that can live the ordinary life with extraordinary awareness.
 
 
 
Religion is not a question 
of changing life patterns, 
of changing things and situations. 
 
Religion changes you, 
not your situation. 
 
It does not change things: 
it changes the way you look at things. 
 
It changes your eyes, your vision
it gives you an insight. 
 
 
 
Then God is not something against life: 
then God is the intrinsic core of life. 
 
Then spirit is not anti-matter 
but the highest form of matter, 
the purest fragrance of matter.
 
 
 
Mariel Strauss, if you avoid sannyas that will be being serious. 
 
You have not understood that 
this is not the same kind of initiation. 
 
You have been into many schools, 
and you have gathered much knowledge about initiation and the mysteries 
-- but this is not that kind of initiation. 
 
It is just the opposite: 
it is getting initiated into life, into the ordinary life. 
 
Once your ordinary life becomes suffused with your meditativeness you are a sannyasin. 
 
 
 
It is not a question of changing your clothes only 
-- that is only symbolic -- 
 
the real sannyasin is 
bringing meditation to the ordinary affairs of life, 
bringing meditation to the marketplace. 
 
Eating, 
walking, 
sleeping, 
one can remain continuously in a state of meditation. 
 
It is nothing special that you are doing, 
but doing the same things 
with a new way, 
with a new method, 
with new art.
 
Sannyas changes your outlook.
 
 
 
You listened to my advice and for nine months, 
you say, 
you stopped almost everything 
and got good results from following the advice. 
 
But somewhere deep down you are still serious; 
otherwise you would have taken a jump into sannyas 
-- nonseriously.
 
Even to ask about it is to show your seriousness. 
 
You could not accept it playfully, with a laughter.
 
 
 
Sannyas is just a play -- LEELA. 
 
That concept is not known in the West; 
the West has missed much 
because of not knowing that concept. 
 
In the West, religion has no idea that 
God is not a creator but a player, 
that existence is not his creation but his play of energies. 
 
Just like the ocean waves roaring, 
shattering on the banks and the rocks, 
eternally, just a play of energy, 
so is God. 
 
These millions of forms are not created by God, 
those are just because of his overflowing energy.
 
 
 
God is not a person at all. 
 
You cannot worship God. 
 
You can live in a godly way 
but you cannot worship God 
-- there is nobody to worship. 
 
All your worship is sheer stupidity, 
all your images of God are your own creation. 
 
There is no God as such, 
but there is godliness, certainly 
-- in the flowers, 
in the birds, 
in the stars, 
in the eyes of the people, 
when a song arises in the heart and poetry surrounds you... 
all this is God. 
 
Let us say "godliness" rather than using the word 'God'
-- that word gives you the idea of a person, 
and God is not a person but a presence.
 
 
 
Sannyas is not like becoming a Hindu or a Christian or a Mohammedan. 
 
In fact, it is dropping out of all these trips 
-- Hindu, Christian, Mohammedan, all these trips. 
 
Sannyas is simply dropping out of all ideologies. 
 
Ideologies are bound to be serious; 
 
no ideology can have laughter as its spirit, 
because ideologies have to 
fight with each other, 
argue with each other, 
and argument cannot be done with laughter. 
 
Argument has to be serious! 
 
Argument is basically egoistic, 
how can it laugh? 
 
The ego knows no laughter at all.
 
 
 
Once it happened:
 
A great philosopher and thinker, Keshav Chandra Sen, went to see Ramakrishna. 
 
He wanted to defeat Ramakrishna, 
and, certainly, he was capable of great argument. 
 
He argued against God, against religion, against the whole nonsense that Ramakrishna was doing. 
 
He was trying to prove that Ramakrishna was a fool, 
that there is no God, 
that nobody has ever proved the existence of God. 
 
He talked and talked, 
and slowly slowly he started feeling a little weird 
because Ramakrishna would only laugh. 
 
He would listen to the argument and laugh 
-- and not only laugh, 
he would jump, 
hug Keshav Chandra Sen, 
kiss him and say,
 
"Beautiful! This argument I have never heard! 
It is really intelligent, clever."
 
Keshav Chandra Sen started feeling very embarrassed. 
A crowd had gathered seeing that Keshav Chandra, a great philosopher, is going to Ramakrishna; 
many people had come to listen, hearing that something is going to transpire there. 
 
Even they started feeling that the whole journey had been futile. 
 
"This is a strange thing that is happening!"
 
And Ramakrishna danced and laughed and he said, 
 
"Even if there had been any doubt in my mind about God, 
you have destroyed it. 
How can there be such intelligence without God? 
You are proof, Keshav Chandra 
-- I believe in you."
 
And Keshav Chandra has written in his memoirs, 
 
"Ramakrishna's laughter defeated me 
-- defeated me forever.
I forgot all arguments. 
It looked so foolish! 
And he had not argued against me, 
he had not even said a single word against me. 
He simply kissed me, hugged me, laughed, danced. 
He appreciated me as nobody has ever appreciated
-- and I was talking against him! 
 
He said, 
'Keshav Chandra, your presence, 
such intelligence, such genius, 
is enough proof that God is!' 
He said this to me," 
 
Keshav Chandra writes, 
 
"but really his presence, his laughter, his dance, his hugging and kissing, 
proved to me that God is; 
otherwise, how is such a phenomenon as Ramakrishna possible?"
 
The uneducated Ramakrishna, the villager Ramakrishna, 
proved far more profound than the very sophisticated, educated Keshav Chandra. 
 
What happened? 
 
Something tremendously beautiful happened. 
 
Ramakrishna is really religious; 
he knows what religion is, 
he knows what godliness is: 
to take life in a dancing way, 
to take life singing, 
to accept life in all its manifoldness, 
without any judgment 
-- to love it for what it is.
 
 
 
A sannyasin means one who is not trying to solve the mystery of life 
but is diving deep into the mystery itself. 
 
Living the mystery is sannyas, 
not solving the mystery. 
 
If you start solving it 
you become serious.
 
If you start living it 
you become more and more playful.
 
 
 
Mariel Strauss, see the difference between sannyas and other initiations. 
 
There is a qualitative difference. 
 
It is not initiation in the old sense, 
just as it is not a learning in the old sense 
-- it is an unlearning, 
and so I can say it is UNinitiation. 
 
It will bring you out of all your initiations, 
because if you have been to so many schools and sects and ideologies, 
many things must be still hanging around inside you. 
 
You need a good cleaning, 
you need a thorough cleaning, 
you need a good bath 
 
-- and sannyas will give you a shower, 
it will cleanse your soul. 
 
It will give you back the innocence of a child, 
the laughter of a child, 
the eyes full of wonder and awe.
 
 
 
Don't hesitate... take the jump. 
 
It is a jump, 
because you cannot come to it through thinking. 
 
It is a jump 
because it is not a conclusion of your mind. 
 
To others it will look like madness
-- in fact all love is mad 
and all love is blind, 
at least to those who don't know what love is. 
 
To UNlovers love is blind; 
to lovers love is the only possible eye which can see to the very core of existence. 
 
To those who don't know the taste of religion, 
sannyas is madness; 
 
but to those who know, 
everything else is madness except sannyas. 
 
This is entering into sanity. 
 
I don't see anything 
saner than laughter, 
saner than love, 
saner than celebration.
 
 
 
But you are still thinking in serious terms: 
'initiation' is a great word. 
 
You are still obsessed with your old ideas, 
still afraid that you may start trying too hard. 
 
In fact, you are still trying.
 
 
 
First I had suggested to you not to try too hard. 
 
Now you are trying too hard on the opposite end, on the polar opposite: 
trying too hard not to try hard! 
It is the same thing. 
 
Become a sannyasin and forget all this nonsense. 
 
Then one transcends trying and nontrying both. 
 
A great laughter is waiting for you. 
 
And the moment the beyond starts laughing inside you, giggling inside you, 
then you know for the first time 
what it means to be a christ, 
what it means to be a buddha.
 
 
 
But Christians say Christ never laughed 
-- this is THEIR idea about Christ. 
 
This is not true about the real Christ 
-- I know the man! 
 
It is impossible to conceive that he never laughed. 
 
He enjoyed good food, 
you know, 
dining and wining both; 
 
he enjoyed beautiful company. 
 
And if you want beautiful company 
you have to find it not in the scholars but in the gamblers; 
 
if you really want good company 
you will have to move to those who live on the fringes of your so-called society 
-- the fringe people, 
the outsiders, 
the gamblers, 
the drunkards, 
the prostitutes -- 
because your society has become so dull and dead. 
 
The established society is almost a cemetery; 
you don't meet people there, 
you meet only dead bodies, corpses 
-- walking, talking, moving, doing things... 
it is a miracle!
 
 
 
One day a small boy was asking me,
 
"Do you believe in ghosts?"
 
I said, 
 
"Believe? -- I am surrounded by ghosts!"
 
He understood the point immediately. 
 
He said, 
 
"So... so you mean... the people in the streets and the market are all ghosts?"
 
I said, 
 
"Yes, they are all ghosts. 
They are all living a post-mortem existence. 
They have died long ago. 
In fact, they died before they were ever born."
 
 
 
The society kills and kills slowly, skillfully. 
 
You never become aware 
because it is done so slowly, that's why. 
 
A child is slowly poisoned.
 
 
 
In the East, in the past, 
there used to be a certain kind of woman detective. 
 
Those woman detectives were called 
VISHKANYAS -- poisoned girls. 
 
Certain beautiful girls were poisoned very slowly from the very beginning with the mother's milk
-- it is an historical fact -- 
but the poison was given in such small doses that it would not kill them immediately; 
but slowly slowly their whole system would become poisoned. 
 
Poison would flow in their blood, 
their breath would become poison. 
 
By the time they became adolescent, 
they would be ready to be used by the kings, 
and they were so beautiful that it was very easy to allure anybody with them. 
 
They were sent to the enemy king who was bound to fall in the trap of the beautiful woman, 
and once the woman kissed the man that was the end of him. 
 
Just the kiss was enough to kill; 
a kiss of death it was. 
 
To make love to such a woman will be the end
-- you will die like a few spiders die. 
 
There are a few spiders who die while making love 
-- because the girlfriend starts eating them 
while they are getting higher and higher, 
and they are in such ecstasy -- 
you know spiders -- trembling, 
and they have completely forgotten the world. 
 
They are no longer material, 
they are spiritual. 
 
But women are women; 
they are very materialistic. 
 
The moment the spider gets into his orgasmic spasms, 
the girlfriend starts eating him. 
 
By the time he comes back, he is no more. 
 
He was thinking he was coming
-- he was really going!
 
Those poisoned girls were trained... 
but the miracle was that so much poison didn't kill them. 
 
It was given in such mild doses, very slowly.
 
 
 
A scientist was experimenting with frogs: 
he threw a frog into boiling water
-- of course, the frog jumped immediately out of it. 
 
Then he gave the frog just ordinary water, normal temperature; 
the frog enjoyed the bucket, sat at the bottom, relaxed, 
and the scientist started heating it up slowly slowly, very slowly. 
 
Within hours it was boiling, 
but the frog didn't jump out of it... 
he died. 
 
He never became aware, 
the thing happened so slowly.
 
 
 
And that's what is happening in society.
 
It takes almost twenty-five years to kill a child totally, to poison a child totally. 
 
By the time he comes from the university 
he is dead, 
he is finished; 
now he will live a post-mortem existence.
 
 
 
I can see a grain of truth in the hippie idea that don't trust a man beyond thirty. 
 
There IS some truth in it. 
 
By the time a man is thirty he is no longer alive
-- if he is still alive 
he will become a Buddha, 
he will be a Christ, 
he will be a Krishna. 
 
But by that time people die
-- and they die so unconsciously that they go on living as if they are alive.
 
 
 
Sannyas means giving you your life back. 
 
It is a process of deprogramming you, 
unconditioning you, 
unpoisoning you. 
 
You cannot decide logically to be a sannyasin, 
because that very mind is a problem, 
and you are trying to decide with that very mind. 
 
Sannyas has to be a jump. 
 
It happens from the heart, 
not from the head.
 
 
 
Mariel Strauss, you are still thinking from the head. 
 
Please, get down from the head. 
 
At least let one thing happen from the heart 
-- not logically but illogically, 
not in a prosaic way but in a poetic way. 
 
 
 
Sannyas has to be a love affair! 
 
Nonserious, full of laughter, enter into it... 
 
and you will be surprised that this is not some other initiation. 
 
This will bring out all your initiations 
and all your philosophy 
and all your systems of thought. 
 
Sannyas is 
relaxing in life, 
trusting in life, 
resting in life. 
 
Nowhere to go, 
nothing to achieve, 
 
then the whole energy is available to dance and sing and celebrate.
 
 
 
The second question:
Question 2
BELOVED MASTER,
WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE A DISCIPLE?
 
 
 
Prem Samadhi, 
it is one of the most delicate mysteries. 
 
No definition is possible of a disciple, 
 
but a few hints can be given, 
just fingers pointing to the moon. 
 
Don't cling to the fingers
-- look at the moon 
and forget the fingers.
 
 
 
A disciple is a rare phenomenon.
 
It is very easy to be a student 
because the student is searching knowledge. 
 
The student can only meet the teacher,
he can never meet the master. 
 
 
 
The reality of the master will remain hidden to the student. 
 
The student functions from the head. 
 
He functions logically, rationally. 
 
He gathers knowledge, 
he becomes more and more knowledgeable. 
 
Finally in his own turn he will become a teacher, 
but all that he knows is borrowed, 
nothing is really his own.
 
His existence is pseudo; 
it is a carbon-copy existence. 
 
He has not known his original face. 
 
 
 
He knows about God, 
but he does not know God himself. 
 
He knows about love, 
but he has never dared to love himself. 
 
He knows much about poetry, 
but he has not tasted the spirit of poetry itself. 
 
He may talk about beauty, 
he may write treatises on beauty, 
but he has no vision, no experience, no existential intimacy with beauty. 
 
He has never danced with a roseflower. 
 
The sunrise happens there outside, 
but nothing happens inside his heart. 
 
That darkness inside him remains the same as it was before. 
 
He talks only about concepts, 
he knows nothing of truth 
-- because truth cannot be known through words, scriptures. 
 
A student is interested only in 
words, 
scriptures, 
theories, 
systems of thought, 
philosophies,
ideologies.
 
 
 
A disciple is a totally different phenomenon. 
 
A disciple is not a student; 
 
he is not interested in knowing about 
God, 
love, 
truth 
 
-- he is interested 
in becoming God, 
in becoming truth, 
in becoming love. 
 
 
 
Remember the difference. 
 
Knowing about is one thing, 
becoming is totally different. 
 
 
 
The student is taking no risk; 
the disciple is going into the uncharted sea. 
 
 
 
The student is miserly, he is a hoarder; 
only then he can gather knowledge. 
 
He is greedy; 
he accumulates knowledge as the greedy person accumulates wealth 
-- knowledge is his wealth. 
 
 
 
The disciple is not interested in hoarding; 
he wants to experience, 
he wants to taste, 
and for that he is ready to risk all.
 
The disciple will be able to find the master. 
 
 
 
The relationship between a student and a teacher is that of the head, 
 
and 
 
a relationship between a disciple and a master is that of the heart 
-- it is a love relationship, 
mad in the eyes of the world, utterly mad. 
 
In fact, no love is so total as the love that happens between the master and the disciple. 
 
The love that happened between 
John and Jesus, 
the love that happened between 
Sariputta and Buddha, 
Gautama and Mahavira, 
Arjuna and Krishna, 
Chuang Tzu and Lao Tzu 
-- these are the real love stories, 
the highest pinnacles of love.
 
 
 
The disciple starts melting into the master. 
 
The disciple destroys all distance between himself and the master; 
 
the disciple yields, 
the disciple surrenders, 
the disciple effaces himself. 
 
He becomes a nonentity, 
he becomes a nothingness. 
 
And in that nothingness his heart opens. 
 
In that absence his ego has disappeared 
and the master can penetrate into his being.
 
The disciple is receptive, vulnerable, unguarded; 
 
he drops all armor. 
He drops all defense measures. 
 
He is ready to die. 
 
If the master says, "Die!" 
he will not wait for a single moment. 
 
The master is his soul, his very being; 
his devotion is unconditional and absolute. 
 
And to know absolute devotion is to know God. 
 
To know absolute surrender is to know the secret-most mystery of life.
 
 
 
The word 'disciple' is also beautiful
-- it means one who is ready to learn. 
 
Hence the word 'discipline' 
-- discipline means creating a space for learning. 
 
And disciple means being ready to learn. 
 
 
 
Who can be ready to learn? 
 
Only one who is ready to drop all his prejudices. 
 
 
 
If you come as a Christian or a Hindu or a Mohammedan, 
you can't be a disciple. 
 
If you simply come as a human being, 
with no a priori prejudice, 
with no belief, 
then only you can become a disciple.
 
 
 
A disciple is the rarest flowering of human consciousness, 
because beyond the disciple there is only one peak more 
-- the master. 
 
And one who has been totally a disciple one day becomes a master. 
 
Disciplehood is a process of becoming a master. 
 
 
 
But one should not start with the idea of becoming a master; 
otherwise one is going to miss, 
because then it is again an ego trip. 
 
One should come simply to evaporate.
 
You have lived through the ego, 
and your life has been just a misery and nothing else. 
 
Enough is enough! 
 
One day the realization comes that, 
 
"I have wasted a great opportunity by constantly listening to my own ego. 
It has been driving me onto unnecessary paths which lead nowhere, 
and it has been creating a thousand and one miseries." 
 
The day one realizes that
 
"The ego is the root cause of my misery," 
 
one starts searching for a place where the ego can be dropped. 
 
The master is an excuse to drop the ego.
 
 
 
You can drop your ego only if you come across a person who catches hold of your heart so tremendously 
that his being becomes more important than your own being, 
that you can sacrifice all that you have for him.
 
 
 
Just a few days ago,
I received a letter from Gunakar from Germany. 
 
In German newspapers a statement of Teertha's has been given too much importance and has been criticized
-- and it can be criticized, manipulated, 
 
because what has happened in Jonestown has become the talk of the world. 
 
Somebody, a journalist from Germany, has asked Teertha,
 
"If your master asks you to shoot yourself, to kill yourself, 
what are you going to do?" 
 
And Teertha said, 
 
"There is no question of thinking at all. 
I will kill myself immediately."
 
Now, this statement can be manipulated in such a way that the place that I am creating is going to be another Jonestown. 
 
Teertha has said it out of his heart; 
he has not been political, diplomatic; 
otherwise he would have avoided such a statement. 
 
He had simply said what a disciple is bound to say.
 
The disciple is ready. 
 
In fact to say that he is ready to die is something less than the truth. 
 
 
 
The disciple has already died into the master; 
it is not going to happen in the future, 
it has already happened. 
 
It has happened the day the disciple accepted the master as his master: 
since then he has been no more, 
only the master lives in him. 
 
Slowly slowly, the presence of the master overfloods the disciple. 
 
 
 
And the presence of the master is not really the presence of the master himself: 
 
the master is overflooded with God. 
 
 
 
The master is only a vehicle, a passage, a messenger; 
it is God flowing through the master. 
 
When the disciple surrenders to the master totally 
he is really surrendering to God in the guise of the master. 
 
God he cannot see yet, 
but the master he can see, 
and in the master he can see something godly. 
 
The master becomes the first proof of God to him. 
 
Surrendering to the master is surrendering to the visible God. 
 
And, slowly slowly, as the surrender deepens, 
the visible disappears into the invisible. 
 
The master disappears. 
 
When the disciple reaches into the innermost heart of the master, 
he does not find the master there 
but God himself, life itself 
-- indefinable, inexpressible.
 
 
 
Prem Samadhi, 
your question is significant. 
 
You ask,
 
"What does it mean to be a disciple?"
 
It means death 
and it means resurrection. 
 
It means dying into the master 
and being reborn through the master.
 
 
 
The third question:
Question 3
BELOVED MASTER,
WHO ARE YOU? 
ARE YOU THE CHRIST COME BACK?
 
 
 
Prem ananda, 
do you think I am crazy or something? 
 
I am myself. 
 
Why should I be Christ or somebody else? 
 
Christ is Christ. 
 
He is not Krishna 
and he is not Buddha 
and he is not Zarathustra. 
 
Buddha is Buddha; 
he is not Yagnavalka, 
he is not Lao Tzu. 
 
And Socrates is Socrates; 
he is not Mahavira 
and he is not Patanjali.
 
I am myself. 
 
Why should I be Christ? 
 
In fact nothing in existence is ever repeated. 
 
Existence is so creative, 
it always creates new people. 
 
And it is not true only about Christ, Buddha and me
-- it is true about you too. 
 
There has never been another individual like you, and there will never be. 
 
You are absolutely unique. 
 
Existence never repeats, 
 
remember it; 
hence you are incomparable, 
neither higher nor lower. 
 
That's why I say there is no hierarchy in existence. 
 
Each is superb 
and each is unique 
and each is alone. 
 
But such questions continuously go on arising. 
 
There are reasons for such questions.
 
 
 
Prem ananda, 
you must have been taught from your childhood about the second coming of Christ. 
 
Now you have fallen in love with me, 
and you would like somehow to reconcile your childhood mind with your new experiences that are happening here. 
 
You would like to bridge 
what has been told to you 
and 
what is happening to you. 
 
If somehow it can be bridged 
you will feel a little at rest. 
 
If it cannot be bridged 
then there will remain a little tension inside you. 
 
You will have to decide this way or that.
 
You cannot serve two masters 
-- that is the problem, 
that's why these questions arise. 
 
 
 
Now the problem is, 
 
"What to do? 
Should I remain with Christ?" 
 
But you don't know anything about Christ except what has been told to you. 
 
Christ is only a myth to you. 
 
He was a reality to John, to Luke, 
he was a reality to Matthew. 
 
He is not a reality to you, Prem ananda.
 
I am a reality to you;
I will not be a reality to your children. 
 
You will teach your children about me, 
and one day if they come across a master the problem will arise: 
now what to do? 
 
To choose the past 
or 
to choose the present? 
 
That is the problem.
 
 
 
You are hesitating. 
 
You are afraid that if you choose me 
you will be betraying Jesus. 
 
No, I am not Christ. 
 
But by choosing me 
you will not be betraying Jesus, 
you will be fulfilling him. 
 
I am not Buddha, 
 
but by choosing me 
you will not be betraying Buddha; 
you will be making him as happy as possible,
because by choosing me 
you will be choosing the essential core of religion. 
 
 
 
It is not a question of Christ, Buddha or me; 
these are only forms. 
 
Don't be too attached to forms: 
remember the essential core.
 
 
 
A man in a restaurant calls for the waiter and exclaims,
 
"Waiter! There's a fly walking on my soup."
 
The waiter falls on his knees, raises his hands and cries, 
 
"Jesus is back on earth!"
 
 
 
And I know that Jesus has promised that 
he will be coming back, 
but I don't think that he can be so mad as to fulfill the promise. 
 
 
 
Remember what you have done with him? 
 
And if he still comes after what you have done with him he will be really crazy. 
 
It is impossible; he cannot come. 
 
He may have promised but he cannot fulfill it. 
 
If he fulfills it 
you will crucify him again; 
 
you cannot do otherwise. 
 
That's how you have been treating all the awakened people all over the world. 
 
You cannot tolerate them when they are alive, 
and when they are dead you worship them: 
 
this has been your tradition. 
 
When they are alive they are dangerous; 
you would like to kill them in some way or other. 
 
When they are dead they are very consoling; 
then you will carry their corpses for centuries.
 
 
 
Remember, 
Jesus was not crucified by criminals, sinners. 
 
He was crucified by the rabbis, the priests, the politicians 
-- the respected people. 
 
 
 
What was he doing to these so-called respectable people? 
 
He was becoming a danger to their very life-style. 
 
He was creating great guilt in their being; 
his very presence was a thorn in their flesh: 
 
if he was right, 
then they were all wrong.
 
And this was difficult, 
almost impossible for them to accept 
-- that this son of a carpenter, 
absolutely uneducated, unsophisticated, 
too young to be wise enough.... 
 
He was only thirty when he started preaching, 
and they could not tolerate him even for three years. 
 
By his thirty-third year he was crucified; 
his ministry lasted only for three years.
 
 
 
Buddha was far more fortunate: 
he was able to work for forty-two years. 
 
But Buddha was in a totally different kind of land 
-- not that the Hindus were behaving in any way differently from the Jews, 
 
but Hindus have their own cunning ways of destroying truth. 
 
 
 
The Jews were more straightforward: 
seeing the danger, 
they killed the man. 
 
Hindus are far more cunning, bound to be 
because they are the most ancient race on the earth. 
 
 
 
And Buddha was not a new buddha 
they had to encounter; 
they had encountered many buddhas, 
they had encountered twenty-four Jaina TIRTHANKARAS. 
 
They had seen 
Krishna and 
Rama and 
Parasuram and 
Patanjali and 
Kapil and 
Kanad and 
thousands of others. 
 
They have become very clever and cunning about how to prevent these people from affecting people, from influencing people.
 
There was no need to kill; 
they knew far better methods to kill, 
without killing. 
 
They started interpreting Buddha's words, 
Buddha's sayings, 
in such a way that they lost all their significance. 
 
 
 
There was no need to kill the Buddha; 
this was an easier way: 
interpret Buddha according to old scriptures, 
as if he is simply repeating the old scriptures. 
 
Their method was,
 
"He is not saying anything new.
 
It is written in the Upanishads, 
it is written in the Vedas 
 
We have already got all this; 
he is not original."
 
And he was utterly original. 
 
It is NOT written in the Upanishads, 
and it is not written in the Vedas, 
 
because in the first place it can't be written at all. 
 
 
 
Yes, the people who wrote the Upanishads must have known it, 
 
but it is not written.
 
 
 
Hindus were very clever. 
They started writing commentaries on Buddha 
and they distorted his whole philosophy. 
 
They created so much philosophical argument, so much noise, 
that Buddha's still, small voice was lost, utterly lost. 
 
 
 
And the day he died, 
 
Hindus created thirty-two schools of Buddhist philosophy; 
 
each word was interpreted in thirty-two ways. 
 
 
 
They created so much confusion that the whole point was lost.
 
 
 
In fact, if they had crucified Buddha 
it would have been far better. 
 
Jesus was killed, 
but Jews have not commented on Jesus at all. 
 
Once they killed him they thought, 
 
"Now it is finished and that is that!" 
 
They forgot all about Jesus, 
 
they never mentioned even his name in their scriptures. 
 
They never thought of writing any commentary on his statements. 
 
They thought they have killed him 
and sooner or later people are going to forget all about him 
and there is no problem left.
 
In a way, Jesus' sayings have been saved far more accurately than Buddha's sayings, 
 
because the brahmins, 
the clever and cunning brahmins who gathered around Buddha, 
distorted everything that he was saying. 
 
It was distorted so much that if Buddha comes back he will not be able to believe his own eyes what has happened.
 
 
 
But these people never come back. 
 
A buddha can only be here once. 
 
Once a person has become a buddha or a christ, 
he evaporates and becomes a fragrance of the universe
 
He cannot materialize again.
 
 
 
Jesus may have promised 
because he had to leave his disciples so early. 
 
Nothing was ready... the disciples were not ready 
-- not even a single disciple had yet become enlightened. 
 
And they were at a loss what to do without the master. 
 
They had just come close to him; 
only three years' time is not much. 
 
They have not yet imbibed his spirit. 
 
To console them, 
to help them, 
to keep them integrated 
so they don't start falling apart, 
he must have promised. 
 
He must have said,
 
"Don't be worried, I will be coming back again soon."
 
This promise was only a device. 
 
Remember, 
devices are neither true not false, 
they are only devices. 
 
It was a device 
to keep the spirit in the disciples flowing, 
to keep them integrated, 
to keep them confident, centered, rooted. 
 
It was simply a device! 
 
And it has helped, the device has worked; 
otherwise there would have been no Christians at all. 
 
Those poor disciples would have dispersed 
and slowly slowly would have forgotten all about Jesus. 
 
That's what rabbis and the priests were thinking was going to happen.
 
 
 
But Jesus was far more insightful. 
 
He gave them a promise that,
 
"Wait! Don't be worried, I will be coming back. 
I cannot leave you, I will never leave you."
 
And this promise has helped in another way too: 
 
because this promise has been there, 
the Christian mystic has been able to remember Christ far more concentratedly than a Jaina can remember Mahavira 
-- because there is no promise. 
 
Mahavira has not said that,
"I will come back," 
 
he has not said, 
"I will help you," 
 
he has not said, 
"I will be available to you after I am gone." 
 
In fact he has said, 
"You have to depend on yourself only." 
 
It is true, 
but it is going to be hard for the disciples.
 
 
 
And remember, 
Gurdjieff used to say that a man like Buddha or Christ CAN lie. 
 
And I agree with Gurdjieff perfectly. 
 
If they see that the lie is going to serve the truth, 
they will not be worried. 
 
They will not feel ashamed or guilty; 
they will use the lie in the service of truth. 
 
The lie becomes a device. 
 
Buddha calls it UPAYA -- a device.
 
 
 
Christian mystics have been able to remember Jesus far more deeply 
because this confidence that he will be helpful, 
that he is around, 
that whenever he is called he will be coming back.... 
 
Not that he will come,
not that he is around, 
not that he is going to help, 
but this very idea that his help is available makes you centered. 
 
So in a way, without helping you, he HAS helped. 
 
The lie becomes true; 
the lie is no longer a lie, it becomes truth.
 
 
 
But don't take such promises seriously. 
 
There is no need for me to be a christ just to console you. 
 
You have to drop your old ideas; 
otherwise it is going to be a real problem for me. 
 
Here are Hindus, Mohammedans, Christians, Jainas, Buddhists, Parsis, Sikhs, 
and if the Sikhs say, "Are you Nanak?" 
and the Jainas say, "Are you the Jaina?" 
and the Buddhists say, "Are you the Buddha?" 
it will become troublesome.
I cannot be all these people.
 
This is a gathering not of one religion, 
this is a gathering of all the religions of the world. 
 
This is a true human gathering, 
this is a true international gathering, a universal brotherhood.
 
Don't pay much attention to such promises, 
they are devices. 
 
But now they are of no more use to you. 
 
 
 
I am available here alive 
-- what is the point of thinking of a device which was invented two thousand years before? 
 
I am inventing devices every day for you, 
and while I am alive, 
please use them. 
 
It will be far more beneficial 
and easy to be benefited by them.
 
 
 
They met at a party. 
 
He was overwhelmed by her great beauty and vivacity.
 
"I suppose that you have more invitations than you can possibly accept." 
 
he said.
 
"I cannot go out very often," 
 
she answered somewhat evasively, 
 
"because I work. 
But when I don't want to go out with a man,
I simply tell him that I live in the suburbs." 
 
"What a clever idea," 
 
he said, laughing. 
 
"And where DO you live?"
 
"In the suburbs," 
 
she answered sweetly.
 
 
 
Be very alert. 
 
Jesus certainly said, 
 
"I will come."
 
It was just to wipe the tears from his disciples' eyes, 
it was out of compassion. 
 
 
 
But a man who has attained to God cannot come back. 
 
It is impossible; 
in the very nature of things it is impossible 
 
-- because he cannot enter into the body again. 
 
To enter into the body, 
you need a certain desire, 
a tremendous desire. 
 
And the man who has attained God has no desires left. 
 
It is through the doors of desire that a man enters into the body. 
 
If all desires are gone, 
then there is no way to enter into the body, 
to enter into the womb.
 
Hence, in the East, 
we know that once a buddha is gone 
he is gone forever. 
 
You can try to understand his teachings, 
but far better will be if you can find a buddha alive somewhere. 
 
And it never happens that if you search you will not find a buddha somewhere. 
 
If you really search you are bound to find a buddha somewhere or other. 
 
Somewhere or other in the darkness of the world there are always a few flames; 
 
they are always there because God is still hopeful, 
because God is still compassionate, 
because existence cares for you.
 
 
 
If you can come across a living buddha, a living christ, 
forget all about the past buddhas and past christs. 
 
He contains all, 
and yet he cannot be identified with anyone in particular. 
 
He himself is a buddha, 
he himself is a christ in his own right.
 
 
 
So I don't claim that I am Christ,
I don't claim that I am Buddha. 
 
I simply claim that I have arrived, 
that I am at home. 
 
And I have thrown my doors open. 
 
If you are really a seeker, 
a lover of truth, 
don't miss this opportunity....
 
 
 
The fourth question:
Question 4
BELOVED MASTER,
WHEN YOU ARRIVED IN YOUR CAR THIS MORNING I HEARD A BELLY LAUGH COME FROM HEAVEN. 
WOULD THAT BE A FRIEND OF YOURS?
 
 
 
Dharma Chetana, I had also heard the laughter. 
 
It did not come from the heaven 
-- the ghost of Jugal Kishore Birla was just standing by the side of Shiva. 
 
He played a trick on Charlie who is my engineer and mechanic for the Benz. 
 
He tricked Charlie: 
he connected the battery in a wrong way. 
 
Now, a German engineer, especially a mechanic for Mercedes Benz, a trained expert, highly intelligent, connected the battery wrongly! 
 
How is this possible? 
 
The ghost of Jugal Kishore Birla tricked him, 
so something got burned, 
and I had to come in Jugal Kishore Birla's car 
-- an Ambassador.
 
Certainly he was waiting here by the side of Shiva. 
 
Shiva may have even felt it, 
because he was looking all around; 
he must have felt something. 
 
And Chetana, you heard rightly.
 
Jugal Kishore Birla was the manufacturer of Ambassador cars. 
 
He has died. 
We had met a few times. 
He was a Hindu chauvinist, 
and he wanted me to become an ambassador to the world for Hinduism. 
 
For that purpose he had met me a few times; 
that's how we became friendly. 
 
He said to me, 
"I can help you with as much money as you want." 
In fact he was the richest man in India.
 
I said, 
"I can take more money than you have, 
but with one condition."
 
He said, 
"What is that condition?"
 
I said, 
"I will take it unconditionally. 
You cannot make any conditions with me. 
I can take all that you have."
 
He said, 
"Unconditionally? 
But one condition I have to make; 
that's why I am ready to give all support."
 
I said, 
"Please, don't mention it." 
 
But he still mentioned. He said, 
"My condition is very simple: 
can't you become a messenger to the world for Hinduism? 
Hinduism needs somebody to propagate it in such a contemporary 
and modern way that it appeals to the world mind."
 
I said, 
"Then I cannot accept a single PAI from you."
 
He said to me, 
"This is strange 
-- because even Mahatma Gandhi had accepted my conditions."
 
I told him, 
"That's why I never call Mahatma Gandhi 'Mahatma' Gandhi. 
I call him the so-called Mahatma Gandhi; 
otherwise how can anybody accept your conditions? 
 
If he knows, he will not accept any conditions from anybody just for money.
 
I know what the world needs. 
 
It is not Hinduism, 
it is not Christianity, 
it is not Islam. 
 
Enough of all this nonsense! 
 
The world needs a purely religious consciousness, 
with no adjectives attached to it."
 
But he was a good man in a way. 
 
When he was old he tried many times; 
whenever I would go to Delhi 
he would invite me to his palace 
and he would again bring up the subject in some way or other. 
 
I said to him, 
"You have done enough service to humanity; 
now there is no need for any more service. 
 
You have made this Ambassador car 
-- this is really something wonderful! 
All the parts of it make noise except the horn. 
What more service do you want to do to humanity?"
 
So naturally when I said something about him just a few days ago, 
he must have got very angry. 
 
He tricked Charlie. 
This is very rare 
-- an Indian ghost befooling an alive German!
 
He was here, Chetana, you heard him rightly. 
 
But please don't start hearing the laughter of ghosts; 
otherwise you will be in trouble. 
 
Ghosts are always there; 
because you don't hear them you remain oblivious to their presence. 
 
So Chetana, don't grow this capacity any more; 
it is dangerous. 
 
It is enough to hear me; 
there is no need for you to hear other heavenly voices. 
 
There are a few mystics here too who go on hearing heavenly voices. 
 
Every day I receive letters saying, 
 
"I hear this and I heard that." 
 
I am teaching you to be silent 
and I am teaching you not to hear anything. 
 
And all those voices are in your head; 
they don't come from heaven. 
 
It is really a very distant call 
-- it won't work, 
particularly in the rainy season, 
and not in India.
 
 
 
Remember one thing: 
all that is heard, 
all that is read, 
is trivia. 
 
 
 
Only your silence 
 
-- that hears, 
that silence in which the sounds come -- 
 
that silence is significant. 
 
 
 
Shift your consciousness from every object to subjectivity, 
from what you hear to the one who hears, 
from what you see to the one who sees.
 
 
 
But Chetana has joked, 
so I am not worried about her. 
 
And I love such small jokes: 
they keep the idea of playfulness alive. 
 
They keep my idea of religion alive.
 
 
 
The last question:
Question 5
BELOVED MASTER,
WHY ARE THERE SO MANY RELIGIONS IN THE WORLD?
 
 
 
Nagesh, why are there so many languages in the world?
 
-- because there are so many people, 
so many ways to express. 
 
And it is not bad, it is good; 
 
the world is richer because of it. 
 
So many languages make the world tremendously rich. 
 
It gives variety, like so many flowers in the garden and so many birds.
 
 
 
Just think: 
only one flower all over the world, 
the marigold, 
and the whole world will look ugly; 
or the rose
-- just one flower all over the world. 
 
And what will you do with those roses? 
 
Nobody will write any poetry about roses anymore then. 
 
And if you will compare your woman's face with the flower of the rose 
she will become angry, 
she will threaten you with a divorce. 
 
Roses will lose all meaning; 
they are beautiful because there are millions of other flowers too.
 
 
 
I don't think that the world needs one religion. 
 
The world needs religious consciousness, 
and then that consciousness can flow into as many streams as possible. 
 
In fact, my own idea of religion is that there should be as many religions as there are people 
-- each person having his own religion.
 
It is difficult to have your own language; 
each person cannot have his own language, 
otherwise nobody will understand it.
 
 
 
Mulla Nasruddin has applied for a job. 
The manager looked at him 
and did not feel that he's even qualified to apply for it. 
He asked him, 
 
"Can you read and write?"
 
Mulla Nasruddin said, 
 
"I cannot read, but I can write."
 
The manager was surprised; 
this is a rare situation 
-- he could have never conceived of a man who cannot read but can write. 
He said,
 
"Then write!" 
 
He gave him a paper 
and Mulla immediately started writing on it. 
 
He went fast
-- one page, two pages, three pages.
 
The manager said,
 
"Now you stop! 
You please read what you have written, 
because I cannot read."
 
Nasruddin said,
"That I have told you before
-- I can only write! 
I can't read."
 
 
 
If you speak a language that only you understand, 
it will be impossible to communicate with people. 
 
But a religion 
-- you can have your own, 
because religion need not be communicated. 
 
 
 
Religion is not a dialogue between you and other people; 
 
religion is a dialogue between you and existence. 
 
So any language will do, or no language, or any invented languages 
-- Esperanto, or anything.
 
 
 
All these religions should be taken as different languages, 
then fanaticism loses its danger. 
 
Then it is beautiful! 
 
There are churches and temples and mosques and GURUDWARAS 
-- if we think these are all different languages, 
there is no problem. 
 
You don't see people fighting about which language is the true language 
-- Hindi, Marathi, English, German, French. 
 
Which language is the true language? 
 
Nobody will ask such a question, 
because all languages are arbitrary, made-up. 
 
They are not true or false, 
they are useful.
 
 
 
An Englishman, a Frenchman and a German were arguing about the respective merits of their languages. 
 
The Frenchman said, 
"French is the language of love, 
the language of romance, 
the most beautiful and pure language in the world."
 
The German announced, 
"German is the most vigorous language, 
the language of philosophers, 
the language of Goethe
the language most adaptable to the modern world of science and technology."
 
When the Englishman's turn came he said, 
"I don't understand what you fellows are talking about. 
Take this" 
 
-- and he held up a table knife. 
 
"You in France call it UN COUTEAU, 
you Germans call it EIN MESSER. 
We in England simply call it a knife, 
which, all said and done, is precisely what it is."
 
 
 
This is how religions have been arguing. 
 
Exactly like this has been the argument between religions: 
 
who is right? 
 
Christians, 
Hindus, 
Mohammedans, 
Buddhists, 
Jainas 
 
-- these are only different languages to express the same phenomenon.
 
If once this is understood 
then there is no problem; 
 
I would like many MORE religions to evolve.
 
 
 
In fact in a better world every person will have his own religion, 
because religion is your way of expressing the inexpressible. 
 
It is like aesthetics: 
 
if you love roses and I don't love roses, 
there is no problem. 
 
We don't fight it out; 
we don't take swords and we don't go on a crusade: 
 
"Who is right? 
 
-- because this man says lotuses are beautiful, 
and I say roses are beautiful. 
 
Now it has to be decided on a battlefield."
 
How will you decide? 
 
You can kill me, 
but that won't make any difference. 
 
Even dying, I will go on saying lotuses are the most beautiful flowers; 
my death will not make any change in my vision
 
You can kill a Hindu, 
you can kill a Mohammedan: 
that does not change anything at all.
 
 
 
But this is what, down the ages, people have been doing to each other 
-- fighting ridiculously. 
 
Somebody calls God "Allah" -- he is wrong. 
 
Why? 
 
Somebody calls God "Ram" -- he is wrong. 
 
Why? 
 
-- because you call him "God." 
 
God, Ram, Allah, are all names, invented names for something 
which has no name of its own, 
which is a nameless experience.
 
 
 
There are so many religions, Nagesh, 
because there are so many people, 
different types of people. 
 
Different people have different likings, 
different people have different approaches towards reality, 
and reality is multidimensional.
 
Hence my emphasis is: 
we need a religious consciousness, 
a universal upsurge of religious consciousness. 
 
Of course it will take many forms, 
but forms don't matter; 
as far as the spirit is alive, 
forms don't matter. 
 
And each form is beautiful. 
 
There are so many people: 
each has a different face, a different beauty. 
 
Each person's fingerprints are different from every other person's in the world 
-- but this does not create any trouble. 
 
Each person's footprints towards God's door are going to be different.
 
Once we understand it a great brotherhood is possible. 
 
 
 
Otherwise this nonsense of religious fanaticism 
-- that "Only I am right" -- 
has been very destructive. 
 
 
 
It has destroyed religion itself; 
it has condemned religion and religious people. 
 
That's why there are so many irreligious people, antireligious people. 
 
It is what religion has done to humanity up to now that has created antireligious people 
-- atheists, 
godless people, 
God-denying people. 
 
The responsibility is of the priests, rabbis, popes, pundits, shankaracharyas 
-- these are the responsible people. 
 
They have made religion 
so ugly, 
so inhuman, 
so violent, 
so stupid, 
that any rational person feels a little ashamed of being part of any religious movement.
 
 
 
We have to destroy the ugly heritage of the past. 
 
We have to clean the space for the future. 
 
All are accepted: 
the Bible has its own beauty, 
so has the Koran, 
so has the Gita.
 
 
 
And if you are religious 
you will enjoy the Bible as much as you will enjoy the Koran and the Gita, 
 
because you will know only languages are different. 
 
 
 
And the difference of languages creates different beauty. 
 
Sing the Koran, and you will see the difference. 
 
The Bible cannot be beautiful that way; 
 
the Koran has a singing quality to it. 
 
You can sing the Koran; 
even if you don't understand the meaning, 
the very music of it will be a transforming force. 
 
In fact, the Koran does not have much meaning; 
 
it has great poetry but not much meaning.
 
 
 
Many Mohammedan friends, 
many Mohammedan sannyasins, 
ask me when I am going to speak on the Koran. 
 
I have thought many times. 
Many times I have taken the Koran into my hand, looked here and there, and postponed it again 
-- because the Koran has not much meaning. 
 
It has poetry, 
it has a totally different beauty. 
It is a piece of art!
 
 
 
If you want meaning then the Gita has more meaning, 
but not that much poetry; 
 
then the Bible has more meaning, 
but not that much poetry. 
 
The Bible has its own beauty. 
It is so simple, 
the simplest scripture in the world, 
and because it is simple it has innocence, purity. 
 
Jesus speaks in the language of a villager: 
the parables and the metaphors are all primitive. 
 
But because they are primitive 
they have a purity, 
they are unpolluted 
-- unpolluted by the modern mind. 
 
They are straight,
they go direct to the heart like an arrow. 
 
 
 
But if you want meaning 
then you should look into the Vedas, 
which are full of philosophy. 
 
They have their own beauty 
-- the beauty of intellectuality. 
 
Each scripture has something to contribute to the world, 
and no scripture can do everything. 
 
But because you don't understand different languages, the problem arises. 
 
It will be good to have a few encounters with different religions.
 
 
 
That's why I go on speaking, 
sometimes on Buddhism, 
sometimes on Hinduism, 
sometimes on Christianity, 
sometimes on Judaism, 
on Hassids, 
on Zen, 
on Sufis
-- for a certain reason: 
 
to give you different visions, 
 
so your own eyes can become rich, 
so that you can understand different language also a little bit.
 
 
 
Foster, in Tokyo on business, knew no Japanese. 
Even so, he persuaded an attractive girl, who spoke no English, to come to his hotel room. 
 
All during their lovemaking, 
the Oriental kept shouting "Machigai ana!" with great feeling.
 
Foster felt proud that he could get the girl so aroused to keep yelling, "Machigai ana!" 
 
Foster must have been thinking that this is something like "Fantastic! Far out!"
 
The next afternoon he played golf with a Japanese industrial tycoon. 
 
When the Oriental made a hole-in-one, 
Foster attempted to make a good impression and exclaimed 
"Machigai ana! Machigai ana!"
 
"What do you mean," 
 
snapped the tycoon, 
 
"the wrong hole?"
 
 
 
It is good to know a little bit of other languages too. 
 
It will be a great help to you to have a few glimpses of 
the Koran, 
the Bible, 
the Gita, 
THE DHAMMAPADA. 
 
That will make you 
more liberal
more broad-minded, 
more human.
 
 
 
Enough for today.
 
 
 
Continue to The Dhammapada: The Way of the Buddha, Vol 3 chapter 9 ‘A small candle’…
 
 
 
from osho talks
 
The Dhammapada: The Way of the Buddha, Vol 3
 
Talks given from 11/08/79 am to 21/08/79 am
English Discourse series
 
chapter 8 : A good belly laughter
 
19 August 1979 am in Buddha Hall
 
If you would like to read it in PDF,
there is a free download of this all osho discourses from OSHO RAJNEESH,
please click here.
 
 
 
f:id:premmashal:20181228150420j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150414j:image
 
about subtle body and chakra
yoga : the alpha and the omega, vol 9 ch1
 
f:id:premmashal:20181228150618j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150722j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150627j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150614j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150640j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150622j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150718j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150636j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150657j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150725j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150705j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150631j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150559j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150605j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150553j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150702j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150653j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150709j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150713j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150644j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150648j:image

f:id:premmashal:20181228150609j:image
 
 
 
In this blog, I also shared osho discourse of 
the Tao's 'The secret of the Golden Flower
黄金の華の秘密(太乙金華宗旨)'
and 'The Tao Te Ching 道徳経' by Lao Tzu 老子.
These two show you the way to the enlightenment.
 
If you are interested
please take a look and enjoy!
 
f:id:premmashal:20181228150953j:image
The secret of the Golden Flower
黄金の華の秘密(太乙金華宗旨)
 
f:id:premmashal:20181228151025j:image
The Tao Te Ching 
道徳経 by Lao Tzu 老子
 
 
 
beloved osho
beloved gautam buddha 
beloved all enlightened masters
beloved all
 
 
 
”The last word of Buddha was, sammasati. 
Remember that you are a buddha – sammasati.”
 
 
 
sammasati
It means right remembrance.
 
 
 
meditation & love
 
 
 
osho samadhi समाधिः
 
f:id:premmashal:20181228151056j:image
f:id:premmashal:20181228151131j:image
 

Osho Zen Tarot

Osho Zen Tarot

  • Osho International Corp.
  • ライフスタイル
  • ¥960

OSHO Transformation Tarot

OSHO Transformation Tarot

  • Osho International Corp.
  • エンターテインメント
  • ¥960

The Dhammapada Vol. 3: The Way of the Buddha

The Dhammapada Vol. 3: The Way of the Buddha

  • Osho
  • 宗教/スピリチュアル
  • ¥900